Legal Consequences and Legal Protection of Notarial Deeds Made Based on False Circular Document
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.4739Abstract
Actual or potential, within the limits of reasonable expectation, a Notary may make an authentic deed, but it turns out that the circular document used as the basis for making the authentic deed turns out to be fake. Therefore, this research aims to analyze the consequences and legal protection of Notarial deeds made based on fake circular documents. This research is a normative research that uses statute and conceptual approach. The conclusion of this research is the legal consequences of a Notarial deed made based on a fake circular document, then the party who feels aggrieved by the validity of the deed can apply for the cancellation of the deed to the Court and the Notary is not liability and accountability for the deed he made. Such legal consequences can also be seen as legal protection for Notaries who make deeds but the deeds are based on fake circular documents presented by the parties, so that Notaries are exempted from liability and accountability as long as Notaries have carried out their profession in accordance with applicable protocols and codes ethicsDownloads
References
C.S.T Kansil, (1996), Pokok-Pokok Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta: Pustaka Sinar Harapan. Hlm. 31.
Ridwan Khairandy, (2014), Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Yogyakarta: UII Press. Hlm. 227.
Sovia Hasanah, (7 Maret 2018), Perbedaan RUPS Luar Biasa dengan Keputusan Sirkuler Pemegang Saham, https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5a98c6a34d441/perbedaan-rups-luar-biasadengan-keputusan-sirkuler-pemegang-saham. Diakses pada tanggal 23 Maret 2024.
M. Yahya Harahap, (2016), Hukum Perseroan Terbatas, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Hlm. 341.
Ibid.
Fred B.G. Tumbuan, Tugas dan wewenang Organ Perseroan Terbatas Menurut Undang-undang Tentang Perseroan Terbatas, Makalah, disampaikan pada “Sosialisasi Undang-undang tentang Perseroan Terbatas” yang diselenggarankan oleh Ikatan Notaris Indonesia (INI), Jakarta tanggal 22 Agustus 2007. Hlm. 42.
Hatta Isnaini Wahyu Utomo, (2017), Penggunaan Surrogate Pada Akta Notaris, artikel dalam Kumpulan Tesis Pascasarjana Universitas Narotama. Hlm. 28.
Peter Mahmud Marzuki, (2011), Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group. Hlm. 132.
R. Subekti, (2005), Hukum Perjanjian, Jakarta: Intermasa. Hlm. 29.
Wirjono Prodjodikoro, (1989), Azaz-Azaz Hukum Perjanjian, Bandung: Bale Bandung. Hlm. 61.
Ibid.
R. Soeroso, (2006), Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. Hlm. 295-296.
Abdul Ghofur Anshori, (2009), Lembaga Kenotariatan Indonesia, Yogyakarta: UII Press. Hlm. 22.
Satjipto Raharjo, (2000), Ilmu Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Hlm. 53.
Habib Adjie, (2009), Meneropong Khasanah Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Hlm. 83.
Sudikno Mertokusumo, (2009), Penemuan Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Hlm. 39.
See Article 1 point 1 Regulation the Minister of Law and Human Rights Republic Indonesia Number 7 of 2016.
Minuta deed is the original Deed that includes the signatures of the parties, witnesses, and Notary, which is kept as part of the Notary Protocol. See Article 1 point 8 the Notary Office Act.
Phillipus M. Hadjon, (1987), Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu. Hlm 1-2.
Herlien Budiono, (2013), Kumpulan Tulisan Hukum Perdata di Bidang Kenotariatan Buku Kedua, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti. Hlm. 31.
Habib Adjie, (2009), Sekilas Dunia Notaris dan PPAT Indonesia, Bandung: Mandar Maju. Hlm. 30.
Yuniman Riza, (2008), Notaris dan Jaminan Kepastian Hukum, Surakarta: UNS Press. Hlm. 19.
Milinia Mutiara Yusshinta Dewi dan Bayu Indra Permana, (2022), Keabsahan Akta Yang Dibuat Oleh Calon Notaris Yang Sedang Magang di Kantor Notaris, Jurnal Ilmu Kenotariatan, Vol. 3 No. 2. Hlm. 82.
Yosi Andika Mulyadi, (2016), Kekuatan Pembuktian Akta Otentik Yang Dibuat Dihadapan Notaris Dalam Perkara Pidana, Yogyakarta: Tesis Pasca Sarjana Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Gadjah Mada. Hlm. 26.
Moh. Dani Pratama Huzaini, (28 Juni 2019), Singgung Asas Actori Incumbit Onus Probandi, KPU Bantah Dalil Pemohon Sengketa Pilpres, https://m.hukumonline.com/berita/baca/lt5d08d3e8227c9/singgung-asas-i-actori-incumbit-onus-probandi-i-kpu-bantah-dalil-pemohon-sengketa-pilpres/. Diakses pada tanggal 24 April 2024.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jihan Fernanda, Istislam Istislam, R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi’i
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
