Legal Review of Business Competition in Preventing Predatory Pricing Practices Using Buy One Get One Free and Discount Voucher Methods in the Modern Retail Market

Authors

  • Grace Henni Tampongangoy Universitas Sam Ratulangi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v21i2.4747

Abstract

This study aims to provide an overview of the role of law enforcement and government in business competition to prevent predatory pricing practices using the Buy One Get One Free (BOGO) method and cheap redemption under Law Number 5 of 1999 concerning the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition in modern retail markets. This research employs empirical legal methods focusing on the modern retail market, specifically on minimarket operators such as Alfamart, Indomart, and Alfamidi. The findings indicate that the competition authority (government) plays a significant role in preventing predatory pricing practices through: 1) market supervision, including monitoring market and business activities to detect signs of predatory pricing; 2) conducting thorough investigations into allegations of predatory pricing; 3) enforcing laws with decisive actions against businesses found guilty of predatory pricing; and 4) raising public and business awareness about the risks associated with predatory pricing practices. The research concludes that predatory pricing practices using the BOGO method can distort business competition and harm consumers, highlighting the crucial role of competition law in prevention.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bachtiar, B. (2019). Metode Penelitian Hukum.

Cannon, M. F., & Tanner, M. (2006). Healthy competition: What’s holding back health care and how to free it. AHIP Coverage, 47(3).

Disyon, H., Amalia, G., & Elthania, I. N. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Persaingan Usaha Terhadap Dugaan Praktik Monopoli Penjualan Avtur di Indonesia. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 3(2), 163–174.

Gordon-Hecker, T., Pittarello, A., Shalvi, S., & Roskes, M. (2020). Buy-one-get-one-free deals attract more attention than percentage deals. Journal of Business Research, 111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.070

Hermansyah. (2008). Points of Business Competition Law in Indonesia. Kencana Prenada Media Group. https://opac.perpusnas.go.id/DetailOpac.aspx?id=279884

Li, Y., Khouja, M. J., Pan, J., & Zhou, J. (2023). Buy-One-Get-One Promotions in a Two-Echelon Supply Chain. Management Science, 69(9). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4638

Nabilasari Lesmana, E., & Yustiawan, D. G. P. (2023). Civil Law Analysis of Unwritten Agreements in Business Activities. POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES, 2(2), 109–116. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v2i2.568

Nazhari, A. F., & Irkham, N. (2023). Analisis Dugaan Praktik Predatory Pricing Dan Penyalahgunaan Posisi Dominan Dalam Industri E-Commerce. Jurnal Persaingan Usaha, 3(1), 19–31.

Saputri, F. S., & Rahardjo, S. T. (2020). Analisis Pengaruh Lingkungan Toko, Variasi Produk, Promosi Penjualan, Dan Layanan Tenaga Penjualan Terhadap Kepuasan Konsumen (Studi Pada Alfamart H825 Semarang, Jawa Tengah). Diponegoro Journal of Management, 9(1).

Sianipar, L. H. (2020). Tinjauan Hukum Praktik Jual Rugi dalam Industri Retail Berdasarkan UU No. 5 Tahun 1999 tentang Larangan Praktik Monopoli dan Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat (Studi Pada Swalayan Maju Bersama Glugur).

Downloads

Published

2024-07-23