Economics Analysis of Legal Approach In the Progression of West Lampung Traditional Cultural Expression
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i2.4748Abstract
The value of West Lampung's traditional cultural expressions has not been maximized for the local inhabitants. This article will explain how to implement the local government-requested preservation of West Lampung traditional expressions and their use in accordance with the Economic Analysis of Law framework. The results of the discussion indicate that the Protection and Utilization of Traditional Cultural Expressions has only reached the inventory stage, based on Law No. 28 of 2014 regarding Copyright, Law No. 5 of 2017 regarding Promotion of Culture, Law No. 11 of 2010 regarding Cultural Conservation and Regulations Government No. 6 of 2015 regarding Museums, and Regulation of the Minister of Culture No. 106 regarding Intangible Cultural Heritage of Indonesia. The Economic Analysis of Law demonstrates that West Lampung's traditional cultural expressions must be optimized in order to boost the region's income. This can be maximized through the collaboration of the local government with academics in the arts, artists, Youtubers, artists, and other parties who are already aware of what the global community desires as connoisseurs, so that professional processing can affect the welfare of the people of West LampungDownloads
References
Books
Bentham, Jeremy, The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham: An Introduction To The Principles of Morals and Legislation (Oxford: Clarendon Press): 2016.
Dahlan Thaib, Ketatanegaraan Indonesia: Perspektif Konstitusional, Yogyakarta: Total Media, 2009, hlm.26.
WIPO, 2001, Intellectual Property Needs and Expectations of Traditional Knowledge: WIPO Report on Fact-Finding Missions on Intellectual Property and Traditional Knowledge (1998– 1999). WIPO, Geneva, p69-191.
Lionel Bently and Brad Sherman, 2009, Intellectual Property, Oxford University, p91.
Lindsey, Tim, Hak Kekayaan Intelektual: Suatu Pengantar, PT. Alumni, Bandung, 2006.
Lucas-Schloetter A , 2004 Folklore, dalam von Lewinski S (ed) Indigenous Heritage And Intel- lectual Property: Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge And Folklore. Kluwer Law Inter- national, Alphen aan den Rijn, p293.
Long ED, 2006, Traditional Knowledge and The Fight for The Public Domain. John Marshall Rev Intellectual Property Law 5, p317.
Zhang,2007, Research on Intellectual Property Protection of Folklore, Law Press China, Beijing, p205-206.
WIPO, Consolidated Analysis of the Legal Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions, WIPO Doc WIPO/GRTKF/IC/5/3 , 2003.
Li Luo, Intellectual Property Protection of Traditional Cultural Expressions, DOI 10.1007/978-3- 319-04525-2_2, Switzerland:Springer International Publishing, 2014.
Jurnal
Erlina B., Jainah, Z. O., Safitri, M. ., & Seftiniara, I. N. . (2022). Implementation of the Utilization of West Lampung Traditional Cultural Expression in the Legal System Perspective of Intellectual Property . ENDLESS: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FUTURE STUDIES, 5(3), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.54783/endlessjournal.v5i3.99
Baltic Journal of Law & Politics 15:2 (2022): 100-116 DOI: 10.2478/bjlp-2022-001006
B, E. (2022). Implementation Of Protection Of Traditional Cultural Expression In West Lampung Regency. LEGAL BRIEF, 11(3), 1990–2004. https://doi.org/10.35335/legal.v11i3.390
Lili Rasjidi, Pembangunan Sistem Hukum Dalam Rangka Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, dalam Sri Rahayu Oktoberina dan Niken Savitri (eds), Butir-Butir Pemikiran dalam Hukum Memperingati 70 Tahun Prof.Dr.B.Ar- ief Sidharta, SH, Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2008,hlm.129
J. H. Merryman, “Two Ways of Thinking about Cultural Property,” Am. J. Int. Law, vol. 80, no. 4, pp. 831–853, 1986.
P.Sakul,Y.O.Agow,andN.Pinangkaan,“PerlindunganHukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Warisan Budaya Batik Bangsa Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Hukum Internasional,” Lex Priv., vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 184–192, 2020.
A. Absori, K. Dimyati, and K. Wardiono, “Model Penyelesaian Sengketa Lingkungan Melalui Lembaga Alternatif,” Mimb. Huk., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 367–382, 2008.
H. Husamah, “Mengusung Kembali Khazanah Identitas Budaya Bangsa,” J. Bestari, vol. 42, 2016.
A. Atsar, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pengetahuan Dan Ekspresi Budaya Tradisional Untuk Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat Ditinjau dari Undang-Undang No. 5 Tahun 2017 Tentang Pemajuan Kebudayaan dan Undang-Undang No. 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta,” J. Law Reform Progr. Stud. Magister Ilmu Huk., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 284–299, 2017.
D. Rahayu, “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak Cipta Motif Batik Tanjungbumi Madura,” Mimb. Huk., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 115– 131, 2011.
C. Antons, “Asian Borderlands and the Legal Protection of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions,” Mod. Asian Stud., vol. 47, no. 4, pp. 1403–1433, 2013.
Soerjono Soekanto. “Masalah-Masalah di sekitar Perundang-Undangan (Suatu Tinjauan Menurut Sosiologi Hukum)”., Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan 6.1 (1976): 27-34.
Dieter Dolling et al. “Is Deterrence Effective? Results of a Meta-Analysis of Punishment”. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Volume 15, 201-224 (2009).
Vilhelm Aubert, “Some Social Functions of Legislation”, Acta Sociologica Journal Volume 10 No.1-2 (1967)
Roscoe Pound, “Law in Books and Law in Actions”, American Law Review 44 (1910):12
Roscoe Pound, “The Lawyer as Social Engineer” , Journal of Public Law, 3 (1954) : 292
Norman Kretzmann, ”Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex: Laws on Trial in Aquinas’ Court of Conscience”, American Journal of Jurisprudence, 99 (1988). Lihat juga Andre Santos Campos, ”Aquinas’s ”Lex Iniusta Non Est Lex”: A Test of Legal Validity.” ARSP: Archiv Für Rechts Und Sozialphilosophie / Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy 100,
Joel Feinberg, ”The Right to Disobey.” Michigan Law Review No. 6 (1989)
David M. Kreps. ”Intrinsic Motivation and Extrinsic Incentives.” The American Economic Review, vol. 87, no. 2, (1997).
Kelly Goldsmith, Vladas Griskevicius, and Rebecca Hamilton in Scarcity and Consumer Decision Making: Is Scarcity a Mindset, a Threat, a Reference Point, or a Journey? Journal of the Association for Consumer Research 2020 5:4, 358-364
Adamkovič M, Martončik M. A Review of Consequences of Poverty on Economic Decision-Making: A Hypothesized Model of a Cognitive Mechanism. Front Psychol. 2017 Oct 11;8:1784. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01784. PMID: 29075221; PMCID: PMC5641572.
Cudd, Ann E. “Is Pareto Optimality a Criterion of Justice?” Social Theory and Practice, vol. 22, no. 1, 1996, pp. 1–34. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/23559021. Accessed 22 Feb. 2023.
Aos S., Barnoski R., Lieb R. (1998). Watching the bottom line: Cost-effective interventions for reducing crime in Washington. Olympia, WA: Washington State Institute for Public Policy. (98-01-1201).
Gayer, Gabrielle, Itzhak Gilboa, Larry Samuelson, and David Schmeidler. “Pareto Efficiency with Different Beliefs.” The Journal of Legal Studies 43, no. S2 (2014): S151–71. https://doi.org/10.1086/676636.
Schaefer, David Lewis. “Economic Scarcity and Political Philosophy: Ancient and Modern Views.” International Political Science Review / Revue Internationale de Science Politique 4, no. 3 (1983): 279–94. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1601096.
Endörfer, R., & Larue, L. (2022). What’s the Point of Efficiency? On Heath’s Market Failures Approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 1-25. doi:10.1017/beq.2022.21
Nguyen, S.L., Le, V.A. Diffusion of Geographical Indication Law in Vietnam: “Journey To The West”. IIC (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01289-9
Tischner, A., Stasiuk, K. Spare Parts, Repairs, Trade Marks and Consumer Understanding. IIC 54, 26–60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01274-8
Xiao, Y. Decoding Authorship: Is There Really no Place for an Algorithmic Author Under Copyright Law?. IIC 54, 5–25 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01269-5
Kur, A. No Strings Attached to GIs? About a Blind Spot in the (Academic) Discourse on Limitations and Fundamental Rights. IIC 54, 87–94 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-022-01273-9
Keri A.F. Johnston, Marion Heathcote, The quest for ‘real’ protection for indigenous intangible property rights, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Volume 9, Issue 5, May 2014, Page 345, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpu057
Chijioke Okorie, Technology and national security: what’s IP got to with it?, Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, Volume 17, Issue 8, August 2022, Pages 601–602, https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpac065
Moerland, A. Do Developing Countries Have a Say? Bilateral and Regional Intellectual Property Negotiations with the EU. IIC 48, 760–783 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-017-0634-6
Upreti, P.N. The Role of National and International Intellectual Property Law and Policy in Reconceptualising the Definition of Investment. IIC 52, 103–136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-020-01009-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zainab Ompu Jainah, Erlina B, Melisa Safitri, Intan Nurina Seftiniara, Tami Rusli
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
