The Technical Construction of The 2024 Election Campus Due to Constitutional Court Decision No 65/PUU-XXI/2023: Regional Autonomy Perspective Aspect
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i3.4817Abstract
Constitutional Court Decision Number 65/PUU-
XXI/2023 allows educational institutions to be used
as a place to campaign. This Constitutional Court
decision revises the material of Article 280
paragraph (1) letter h of the Law on Election
campaigns, which basically explains the use of
government facilities, places of worship and
educational places except for government facilities
and educational places as long as they get
permission from the person in charge of the place in
question and are present without election campaign
attributes. the basic reason the campaign must be
carried out because there are groups of voters
because based on KPU data for the 2024 Election
based on age, the age of 17 - 30 years old to vote is
31.23%. In addition, if held on campus, it can be a
forum for political education, testing the capacity of
the candidates, the quality and program of the
candidates, and encouraging student involvement
in democracy of course. However, this will become
a new polemic in the midst of the 2024 Election
discussion if the good idea is not regulated in the
norms of its implementation, what are the
requirements for campaigns on campus if carried
out in the campus environment. The research
carried out is Normative Juridical, because it is
aimed at written regulations of other legal
materials. The data collection technique used is
through document and literature studies of
secondary data in the form of primary, secondary
and tertiary legal materials. The analysis used is
descriptive. If the campus becomes one of the
places/ facilities for the campaign of election
participants, the consequence is that the regulations
regarding election campaigns on campus must be
clearly regulated what the rules are, not only
limited to being allowed but there must be certain
conditions from the start to the end of the campaign
period. For this reason, the role of the government
in this case, the election organizing agency,
especially the KPU and Bawaslu, needs to
coordinate for campaign arrangements on campus
related to substance and technically in order to
prioritize politique education for students.
Downloads
References
Amrurobbi, A. A. (2021). Problematika Sampah Visual Media Luar Ruang: Tinjauan
Regulasi Kampanye Pemilu dan Pilkada Waste Problems of Outdoor Media
Visual: Review of General Election and Regional Head Election Campaign
Regulations. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 4(2), 66–78.
Arief Sidharta. (1999). Refleksi Tentang Struktur Hukum. CV Mandar Maju.
Asshiddiqie, J. (2013). Menegakkan Etika Penyelenggaraan Pemilu. Rajawali Press.
Bambang, S. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Vol. 23, No. 3, December 2024
DP, I., Ernas, S., Razak, M., & Wakano, A. (2022). Keterlibatan Pemerintah Daerah
Dalam Pengembangan Pendidikan Tinggi (Fenomena Di Provinsi Maluku). Al-
Iltizam: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam, 7(1), 133–155.
https://doi.org/10.33477/alt.v7i1.3042
Hendrawan, & Farhanuddin, F. (2024). Kampanye Pemilu Dilembaga Perguruan
Tinggi Sebagai Sarana Pendidikan Politik (Analisis Pasca Putusan Mk No
65/Puu-Xxi/2023. Jurnal Arajang, 6(2), 19–29.
https://doi.org/10.31605/arajang.v6i2.3461
Ilhafa, F., Arrizal, N. Z., & Putri, N. U. (2022). Mewujudkan SDGs Di Bidang Hukum:
Peran Serta Mahasiswa Hukum Dalam Pembangunan Hukum. Seminar Nasional
Hukum Dan Pancasila, 1, 133–141.
Indriyanto. (2013). Pemilu dan demokrasi Indonesia. Gema Budaya Cendekia.
KPU. (2023a). PKPU No 15 Tahun 2023. Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum, 15, 23.
KPU. (2023b). PUTUSAN Nomor 65/PUU-XXI/2023. Putusan, 13(1), 104–116.
Liliweri. (2011). Komunikasi Serba Ada Serba Makna. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi (13th ed.). KENCANA.
Nabitatus, S. (2019). Mahkamah Konstitusi Sebagai Pengawal Demokrasi Dan
Konstitusi Khususnya Dalam Menjalankan Constitutional Review. Administrative
Law and Governance Journal, 2(2), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.14710/alj.v2i2.235-
247
Philips, S. dan D. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum. Alfabeta.
PKPU20/2023, UU7/2017, UU7/2023, PKPU8/2019, PKPU12/2023, PKPU3/2022, &
PKPU15/2023. (2023). Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 20 Tahun 2023
Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum Nomor 15 Tahun
2023 Tentang Kampanye Pemilihan Umum. Komisi Pemilihan Umum, 1–23.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2017). UU no.7 2019 Pemilu Serentak. Undang-Undang
Pemilu.
Qirom, A. (2015). Pemilu Untuk Rakyat. Sinar Jaya.
Ruslan. (n.d.). Manajemen Public Relation dan Media Komunikasi. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Sahrin, A., Arafat, Y., & Hadi, A. M. (2022). Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam
Meningkatkan Daya Saing Daerah di Era Otonomi. DIKSI: Jurnal Kajian
Pendidikan Dan Sosial, 3(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.53299/diksi.v3i2.202
Sholichah, I. F., Paulana, A. N., & Fitriya, P. (2018). Self-Esteem Dan Resiliensi
Akademik Mahasiswa. Proceeding National Conference Psikologi UMG, 2002, 191–
197.
United Nations Human Rights (UNHR). (2021). HUMAN RIGHTS AND ELECTIONS
A Handbook on International A Handbook on International (Issue 2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Vieta Imelda Cornelis, Bachtiar, Siti Marwiyah, Fathul Hamdani, Andik Mannulusi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
