Juridical Analysis of Non-Fulfillment of the Access Principle to the Legal Counsel in Theft Criminal Cases

Imam Malik Arifin; Arifai Arifai; Abdul Jabal Rahim

doi:10.31941/pj.v23i1.5098

Authors

Imam Malik Arifin Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Arifai Arifai Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Abdul Jabal Rahim Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i1.5098

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to know juridical analysis of non-fulfillment of the access principle to the legal counsel in theft criminal cases. The type of this research is Normative Legal Research using a Legislative and a Conceptual Approaches. The Public Prosecutor's indictment cannot be accepted as it was made based on an invalid (legally flawed) Investigation Report (BAP) and was not in accordance with the right of due process of law. Legal aid and the defendant must be accompanied by a legal advisor as regulated in Article 56 of the Criminal Procedure Code so that this creates a gap for the legal advisor in filing an exception and the exception becomes the judge's consideration in making a decision that the public prosecutor's indictment is null and void (Null and Void), as for example in the Interim Decision of the Tapak Tuan District Court Number 106/ Pid.B /2019/ PN.Ttn, which is threatened with imprisonment for a maximum of 7 (seven) years in accordance with the provisions of Article 363 Paragraph (1) 4 of the Criminal Code in conjunction with Article 64 paragraph (1) Criminal Code. However, during the investigation process, he was not accompanied by a legal advisor, making the Investigation Report (BAP) being invalid as well as null and void

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham Ethan Martupa Sahat. (2023). METAMORFOSIS METODE PENELITIAN HUKUM. Civilia: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2(4).

Arief, I. . (2021). Pertimbangan Yuridis Putusan Bebas & Upaya Hukum Kasasi Perkara Pidana. In Jakarta: Mekar Cipta Lestari.

Boiko, I. V., Mekh, Y. V., Soloviova, O. M., Somina, V. A., & Cherviakova, O. B. (2020). Universal human rights and state sovereignty. International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 9. https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2020.09.367

Burchard, C. (2023). Criminal Law Exceptionalism as an Affirmative Ideology, and its Expansionist Discontents. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-021-09614-4

Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772

Friedman, L. M., & Hayden, G. M. (2017). American law: An introduction. In American Law: An Introduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190460587.001.0001

Hamzah, A. (2005). Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. In Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia.

Harahap, Y. (2009). Pembahasan, Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP; Penyidikan dan Penuntutan. In Sinar Grafika.

Heath, T. J. (2008). Number, distribution and concentration of Australian veterinarians in 2006, compared with 1981, 1991 and 2001. Australian Veterinary Journal, 86(7). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-0813.2008.00314.x

Heri Tahir. (2010). Proses Hukum yang Adil Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. In Cetakan Pertama.

Holmes, B. (2020). Non-universal Human Rights? How Article 6 (2) of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Undermines Human Rights. International Human Rights Law Review, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1163/22131035-00901004

Kafrawi, M. F. (2016a). Application Of The Miranda Principle In Terms Of Presenting The Legal Counsel For Criminal Suspects In Indonesia. Pattimura Law Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i1.8

Kafrawi, M. F. (2016b). Application Of The Miranda Principle In Terms Of Presenting The Legal Counsel For Criminal Suspects In Indonesia. Pattimura Law Journal, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.47268/palau.v1i1.2016.8

Kartika, T., & Affila. (2022). IMPLEMENTATION OF THE DEATH PENALTY IN NARCOTIC CRIMINAL CASES (CASE STUDY OF DECISION NUMBER 203/PID.SUS/2019/PN.BLS.). Awang Long Law Review, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.56301/awl.v5i1.576

Kim, M., & Ryu, S. (2019). Forensic Miranda Principle and Procedural Justice. KOREAN CRIMINOLOGICAL REVIEW, 30(4). https://doi.org/10.36889/kcr.2019.12.31.4.303

Kuffa. (2010). Penerapan Kuhap Dalam Praktik Hukum. In Penerapan KUHAP Dalam Praktik Hukum.

Laia, L. (2022). POLITICAL STUDY OF LAW LAW NUMBER 8 OF 1981 CONCERNING THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE IN TERMS OF PRETRIAL LEGAL ASPECTS. PENA LAW: International Journal of Law, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.56107/penalaw.v1i2.43

Löfquist, L. (2020). Is there a universal human right to electricity? International Journal of Human Rights, 24(6). https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2019.1671355

Marzuki, P. M. (2022). Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi, Jurnal Penelitian Hukum. In Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media Group.

Mikołajczyk, B. (2023). Universal human rights instruments and digital literacy of older persons. International Journal of Human Rights, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2022.2131772

Moeljatno. (2002). Asas - Asas Hukum Pidana. In Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Muammar, M., & Baharuddin, W. (2022). Prinsip Miranda Rule Sebagai Hak Asasi Tersangka Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. PATTIMURA Legal Journal, 1(3). https://doi.org/10.47268/pela.v1i3.7504

Muñoz, R. F. (2022). Harnessing Psychology and Technology to Contribute to Making Health Care a Universal Human Right. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 29(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.07.003

Nichlatus, S., Abdul, S., Hasbullah, R., Ardiyan, A., Setiawan, M., Agus, M., Pandi, R., Moch, R., Rizal, C., Zahro’, F., Dermawan, R., Sidiq, M. F., Rezki, W., Qamaria, S., & Kamil, H. (2022). Ragam Metode Penelitian Hukum. Lembaga Studi Hukum Pidana.

P.A.F Lamintang. (1984). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana Dengan Pembahasan Secara Yuridis Menurut Yurisprudensi dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Hukum Pidana.

Ramdayani, S. S., Kharisma, B., & Wibowo, K. (2019). Local Government Spending on Social Protection, Security Order, and Crime. Jurnal Economia, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/economia.v15i2.26828

Saleh, R. (2018). Perbuatan Pidana dan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana. In Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana.

Saputra, R., Setiodjati, J. P., & Barkhuizen, J. (2023). Under-Legislation in Electronic Trials and Renewing Criminal Law Enforcement in Indonesia (Comparison with United States). Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v8i1.67632

Sasmita, R. P. R., Suseno, S., & Jaya, P. Y. (2023). The concept of reasons for eliminating corporate crime in criminal law in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21602

Simuziya, N. J. (2021). Universal human rights vs cultural & religious variations: an African perspective. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2021.1988385

Sopian, S., Kusno, K., Siregar, A. A., Risdalina, R., & Panjaitan, B. (2023). Criminal Law Review of Meth Sales Transactions Which are Evidenced by Police Officers According to Law Number 35 of 2009 Concerning Narcotics in the Jurisdiction of the Bukit Tinggi Police. Journal of Social Research, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i4.794

Tamin, B. Y. (2018). Discretion as to the object of the criminal law of corruption in Indonesia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(4). https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.9.20627

Yarulin, I., & Pozdnyakov, E. (2021). Are Universal Human Rights Universal? Politeja, 18(2(71)). https://doi.org/10.12797/politeja.18.2021.71.03

Zurnetti, A., & Muliati, N. (2022). Customary criminal law policy on domestic violence settlement through restorative justice. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2090083