Implementation of the Business Judgement Rule Doctrine as Legal Protection for Directors in Realizing Good Governance of Regionally-Owned Enterprises

Authors

  • Hamzar Nodi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Ramlan Ramlan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
  • Ida Hanifah Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.5124

Abstract

The form of BUMD governance as a regional company as regulated in UUPD and PPBUMD consists of Regional Public Companies (Perumda) and Regional Limited Companies (Perseroda). The establishment of Perumda is in the form of regional regulations based on regional needs and the feasibility of the business field of the Perumda to be formed. Perumda is a BUMD whose entire capital is owned by one region only and is not in the form of shares. One of the important organs in a company is the board of directors. The board of directors who control the company in daily activities has the authority to determine policies in carrying out its powers and obligations in managing the company must have good intentions, be responsible, have integrity, be honest, and be highly dedicated to advancing and developing the company. The board of directors is fully responsible personally for the company's losses if the person concerned is guilty or negligent in carrying out his duties. The board of directors can take or carry out actions to facilitate his duties as long as it is within the scope of his duties and obligations and does not conflict with customs, fairness, and propriety. Implementation of the business judgment rule (BJR) doctrine as a form of protection given to directors in carrying out their duties and responsibilities in running the company. Business decisions or actions taken by directors are intended to manage the company professionally according to their expertise to generate profits for the company, even though there are risks from these decisions and actions that can cause losses for the company

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aminuddin Ilmar. 2004. Hukum Penanaman Modal di Indonesia Jakarta: Kencana.

Asep Mulyana. 2018. Business Judgment Rule, Praktik Peradilan Terhadap Penyimpangan Dalam Pengelolaan BUMN/BUMD Jakarta: PT Grasindo.

Chabib Soleh dan Heru Rocmansjah. 2010. Pengeloaan Keuangan dan Aset Daerah, Jakarta: Fokusmedia.

I Made Pasek Diantha. 2017. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum, Cetakan Kedua Jakarta: Kencana.

Khopiatuziadah. 2014. “Landasan Hukum Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah: Antara Ada Dan Tiada (Legal Basis on Local Owned Enterprise Management: Between Exixting And Not)”, Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, Vol. 11 No. 3.

Setiawan dkk. 2008. “Model Pelayanan Publik yang Berkeadilan: Studi Empirik ada PDAM Kota Surakarta”, Laporan Penelitian Surakarta: Institute Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

Ronny Hanitijo Soemitro. 1990. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Sugiyono. 2018. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Bandung: Alfabeta.

Ryan Surya Pradhana. 2019. “Wewenang Kepala Daerah Dalam Pengelolaan Badan Usaha Milik Daerah”, Jurnal Hukum PERATUN, Vol. 2, No. 2.

Rudy Badrudin. 2011. Ekonomi Otonomi Daerah, Yogyakarta: UPP STIM YKPN.

Yuliati, Akutansi. 2000. Sektor Publik, Cetakan Kelima, Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Downloads

Published

2024-10-02