Reform of Article 46 Paragraph (3) Letter C of the Broadcasting Law Regarding the Phrase "Prohibition of Advertisements Demonstrating the Form of Cigarettes": Comparative Study With Singapore
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v22i2.5156Abstract
This study has been motivated by the weaknesses in the formulation of the Article 46 Paragraph (3) Letter c of Broadcasting Law No. 32 of 2002, which bans only those cigarette ads showing the shapes of cigarettes and leaves room for the tobacco industry to practice indirect advertisement. The focus of this research is to assess the enforcement of limitations on cigarette promotion in broadcasting law and to explore the legal modification of c of Broadcasting Law Article 46 paragraph 3. The method of the study is a normative juridical approach and comparative law method. The findings reveal that current laws in Indonesia have been ineffective in controlling the increase of the smoking population, among the youth in particular, due to a number of issues that the tobacco industry exploits. In contrast, smoking problems are much less prevalent in Singapore which has imposed more stringent policies. Most importantly, the research also discusses that ineffective regulation in Indonesia results from poor enforcement and light punishments offered for violations of the law. Therefore,there is need for restructuring section Article 46 Paragraph (3) Letter c of the Broadcasting Law, by promoting a bitter pill approach towards cigarette advertising, in addition to the current ineffectual position interrogated, to enhance public health.Downloads
References
Arsyad, H., Rijal, S., & Rokhmansyah, A. (2020). Makna Konseptual dan Makna Asosiatif Narasi Iklan Rokok di Televisi. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Seni, Dan Budaya, 4(2).
Assunta, M., & Chapman, S. (2004). “The World’s Most Hostile Environment” : How the Tobacco Industry Circumvented Singapore’s Advertising ban. Tobacco Control, 4(13).
Bhatia, G., & Sarkar, S. (2023). Tobacco Industry and Surrogate Advertising in South East Asia Region: Moves and Countermoves. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 45(2).
Black, H. C., Garner, B. A., McDaniel, B. R., Schultz, D. W., & Company, W. P. (1999). Black’s law dictionary (Vol. 196). West Group St. Paul, MN.
Cranston, K. C. (1979). The Ban on Broadcast Cigarette Advertisements. Comm/Ent LS, 2, 333.
Dewi, E. K., Chumaida, Z. V., & Wulandari, S. A. (2024). Characteristics Of Indirect Evidence Towards Price Fixing Agreements In The Perspective Of Competition Law. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 3(1), 139–155.
Eberle, E. J. (2009). The Method and Role of Comparative Law. Washington University Global Studies Law Review, 8(3).
Fuemmeler, B. F., Wheeler, D. C., Miller, C. A., Hayes, R. B., Do, E. K., Jeremy Barsell, D., Fugate-Laus, K., & Pope, M. A. (2024). Advertising exposure from online and offline sources and youth tobacco use: Findings from the Adolescents, Place, and Behavior Study. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 26(3), 353–360.
Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu perundang-undangan: jenis, fungsi dan materi muata.
Leung, J., Lim, C., McClure-Thomas, C., Foo, S., Sebayang, S., Farassania, G., Fausiah, F., Gartner, C., & Chan, G. C. K. (2023). Adolescent Exposure to Online Advertisements and Promotions for Tobacco Products on the Internet—A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Global Youth Tobacco Surveys. Journal of Adolescent Health, 73(6), 1138–1144.
Miru, A. (2004). Hukum perlindungan konsumen. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Moriarty, S., Mitchell, N. D., Wells, W. D., Crawford, R., Brennan, L., & Spence-Stone, R. (2014). Advertising: Principles and practice. Pearson Australia.
Nadhilah, E. (2016). Strategi Singapura dalam Pengendalian Konsumsi Tembakau pada Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) Tahun 2010-2014. JOM FISIP, 3(2).
Onzivu, W. (2000). Public Health and the Tobacco Problem: International Legal Implications for Africa. Ga. J. Int’l & Comp. L., 29, 223.
Primawardani, Y. (2012). Perlindungan dan Pemenuhan Hak Anak (Balita) Atas Kesehatan Terhadap Bahaya Asap Rokok. Jurnal Hak Asasi Manusia, 3(2).
Saffer, H., & Chaloupka, F. (2000). The Effect of Tobacco Advertising Bans on Tobacco Consumption. Journal of Health Economics, 2.
Sari, I. M. D. C. A. (2011). Dana Bagi Hasil (DBH) Cukai Hasil Tembakau ditinjau dari Cukai Rokok, Kesehatan dan Industri Rokok. Judiciary (Jurnal Hukum Dan Keadilan).
Sari, I. M. D. C. A. (2012). Hubungan Kewenangan antara Pemerintah Pusat dengan Pemerintah Daerah dalam Pelaksanaan Program/Kegiatan Alokasi Dana Cukai Hasil Tembakau. Yuridika, 27(3).
Sitorus, D. V. L. B., Artha, I. G., & Sudjana, I. K. (2017). Penyiaran Beritakriminal Dalam Kerangka Perlindungan Hak Tersangka/Terdakwa. 32(3), 415–420. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i3.4853
Venrick, S. J., Kelley, D. E., O’Brien, E., Margolis, K. A., Navarro, M. A., Alexander, J. P., & O’Donnell, A. N. (2023). US digital tobacco marketing and youth: A narrative review. Preventive Medicine Reports, 31, 102094.
Widati, S. (2013). Efektivitas Pesan Bahaya Rokok Pada Bungkus Rokok Terhadap Perilaku Merokok Masyarakat Miskin. Jurnal Promkes, 1(2).
Widnyana, P. R. W., Agung, A. A. I., & Astiti, N. G. K. S. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Pertanggungjawaban Mutlak (Strict Liability) dalam Hukum Perlidungan Konsumen. Jurnal Konstruksi Hukum, 2(2), 244–249.
Zulheri, Z. (2013). Pengaturan Saham Perusahaan Dalam Rezim Hukum Indonesia Dan Singapura Sebagai Pembentukan Pasar Tunggal Asean. Yuridika, 28(1), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v28i1.5717
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Fitrillah I. Hi. Subur, Filbert Jonathan, Rizaldi Tri Pamungkas, Ratu Jagad Qoriatul Huffadz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
