Authority of The Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission Post Amendment to Law No. 19 of 2019: Regresive or Progressive in Law Enforcement?

Fransiscus Xaverius Hastowo Broto Laksito; Rian Saputra; Doris Rahmat; Waluyo Slamet Pradoto; Aji Bawono; Kesya Zhalibina Sunarto

doi:10.31941/pj.v24i2.5334

Authors

Fransiscus Xaverius Hastowo Broto Laksito Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
Rian Saputra Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
Doris Rahmat Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
Waluyo Slamet Pradoto Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
Aji Bawono Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia
Kesya Zhalibina Sunarto Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.5334

Abstract

The aim of this research is to look at the transformation of the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution after the revision of the new Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Law in supporting corruption prevention policies in Indonesia. This research was conducted using doctrinal legal research methods or normative legal research. In this research, the approaches used include: Statute Approach. Conceptual Approach, Historical Approach, Case Approach. The research results show that: 1) The authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) after the promulgation of Law no. 19 of 2019 concerning the Second Amendment to Law no. 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, with the addition of the Supervisory Board within the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) Institution which has quite large authority, namely not only supervision but also the implementation of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Committee, namely that it must first obtain permission from the Supervisory Board before carrying out wiretapping, searches and/ or the confiscation is carried out by the Corruption Eradication Commission, this can hinder law enforcement in eradicating criminal acts of corruption and can also affect the independence of the Eradication of Corruption Crimes within the Corruption Eradication Commission Institution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbas, K. (2021). Corruption Crime Eradication by Corruption Eradication Commission Through Red-handed Catch Operation on Bribery Action. Jurnal Bina Praja, 13(2), 319–329.

Agustino, L., Fitriani, I., Wicaksana, H. H., & Daelami, A. (2021). Corruption Eradication in Indonesia: The Experience of The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK). Journal of Governance, 6(2), 231–243.

Ariani, S. A. F., & Prasetyoningsih, N. (2022). Fighting Corruption Post Revision of the Act of the Corruption Eradication Commission. Media of Law and Sharia, 3(3), 235–254.

Bima, M. R. (2023). Independent Agency Lost in Action: What We Learned from Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) During the Pandemic. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), e1825–e1825.

Esoimeme, E. E. (2019). A critical analysis of the anti-corruption policy of the federal executive council of Nigeria. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 22(2), 176–187.

Hartono, B. (2020). Corruption Eradication Policy Judging from the Politics of Criminal Law (Law Number 19 of 2019 Concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 Concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission). International Conference on Law, Economics and Health (ICLEH 2020), 551–554.

Hutabarat, D. T. H., Delardi, E., Irwansyah, A., Bascara, D., Ansori, B., Tanjung, F., Sinaga, S. J., Tuah, M., Adrian, R., & Budi, A. (2022). The Eradication Of Corruption And The Enforcement Of The Law In Indonesia As Seen Through The Lens Of Legal Philosophy. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues, 1(2), 1–8.

Kusumawardhana, A., Winda, S., & Ariawan, K. (2024). Potential corruption in the stunting alleviation program: A cost-benefit analysis of local food-based feeding program. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(1), 123–136.

Majeed, N., Hilal, A., & Khan, A. N. (2023). Doctrinal Research in Law: Meaning, Scope and Methodology. Bulletin of Business and Economics (BBE), 12(4), 559–563.

Muhammad, R. B., & Rizki, R. (2020). Position of Supervisory Board Organ and Its Implications for the Institutional Corruption Eradication Commission. Position of Supervisory Board Organ and Its Implications for the Institutional Corruption Eradication Commission, 16(02), 1–19.

Nashrullah, J. (2023). Interpretation Of The Position Of The Corruption Eradication Commission As An Executive Agency. Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 25(1), 53–77.

Omelchuk, O. M., Haiur, I. Y., Kozytska, O. G., Prysiazhna, A. V, & Khmelevska, N. V. (2022). Analysis of the activities of law enforcement authorities in the field of combating crime and corruption offences. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 25(3), 700–716.

Putra, N. R., & Linda, R. (2022). Corruption in Indonesia: A challenge for social changes. Integrity: Anti-Corruption Journal, 8(1), 13–14.

Putriyana, A., & Rochaeti, N. (2021). The impact of enforcement of corruption law by the corruption eradication commission after the ratification of the latest KPK law. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 21(3), 299.

Silalahi, J. S. (2023). Additional Criminal Impositions in Corruption Crimes. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 7(4), 3406–3411.

Singh, D. (2019). Challenging corruption and clientelism in post-conflict and developing states. Crime, Law and Social Change, 71(2), 197–216.

Slamkov, G., & Filipovski, Z. (2019). A INSTITUTIONAL APPROACH IN THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION-ANTI-CORRUPTION BODIES. International Scientific Journal Vision, 4(1), 17–42.

Suramin, S. (2021). Indonesian anti-corruption law enforcement: current problems and challenges. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 2(2), 225–242.

Tamanaha, B. Z. (2021). Legal pluralism explained: History, theory, consequences. Oxford University Press, USA.

Trinchera, T. (2020). Confiscation and asset recovery: Better tools to fight bribery and corruption crime. Criminal Law Forum, 31(1), 49–79.

Wantu, F. M., Puluhulawa, J., Swarianata, V., Djafar, L., Sunarti, S., & Hayatulah, G. E. (2024). Restoration of court services as a configuration for legal development with legal certainty, justice and benefits. Multidisciplinary Reviews, 7(4), 2024069.

Wdiodo, W., Sanusi, S., & Sudewo, F. (2022). Eradication of Corruption in Local Governments Based on Cooperation Agreements. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Law, Social Science, Economics, and Education, MALAPY 2022, 28 May 2022, Tegal, Indonesia.

Wibowo, M., Basir, S., & Badry, A. I. (2022). Independence of the KPK Supervisory Board’s Authority after the Amendment of Law No. 19 of 2019. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(12), 372–384.

Wicaksono, M. B. A., & Saputra, R. (2021). Building the eradication of corruption in Indonesia using administrative law. J. Legal Ethical & Regul. Isses, 24, 1.

Zaini, A., & Ridho, M. Z. (2023). The Auxiliary State Organ Authorities in Indonesia: The Constitutional Implications of Law No. 19 of 2019 Concerning KPK. Potret Pemikiran, 27(2), 185–200.