Mutual Legal Support For Cross-Jurisdictional Law Enforcement Among Asean Members (Efforts To Abolish International Dimensions Of Money Laundering In Indonesia)

Authors

  • Efendi Lod Simanjutak Universitas Prasetiya Mulya
  • Yuris Tri Naili Universitas Harapan Bangsa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v23i2.5526

Keywords:

Ekonomi global, pencucian uang, masalah global

Abstract

Transactional crimes, particularly cross-border money laundering, disrupt the global economy. Globalization and scientific and technological advancements have made money launderers able to work across borders and quickly escape to other countries to avoid being prosecuted. In many nations, this scenario leads to the phenomenon of transnational fugitives. Because of this, those who commit crimes against justice and humanity may go unpunished. Cross-border money laundering has grown to be a global issue that calls for a worldwide response. This crime has grown due to globalization, which has also made it simpler for offenders to escape to other countries to avoid being prosecuted. Injustice and impunity may result from this situation. This is because the extradition tool used up to this point has recently lost some effectiveness. Consequently, after the ratification of the ASEAN Treaty on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters 2004 (MLAT 2004), a different tool is required through Mutual Legal Assistance (MLA). This is meant to prevent offenders—particularly Indonesian fugitives who are still at large in Singapore—from going free. However, law enforcement against foreign TPPU in Indonesia must also be rebuilt, particularly regarding inbound extradition. It has not addressed human rights (HAM) or offered legal clarity thus far. The ASEAN principle of free movement of judgment is believed to prevent criminals from going unpunished, and the court should decide on overseas extradition to Indonesia. Recommendation: To combat cross-border money laundering, more formal agreements must be signed, and law enforcement and other nations must work together.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bingham, Tom. The Rule of Law. London: Penguin Books, 2011.

Bohnel, Johannes. "Banking Confidentiality and State Controls of Currency Transaction and Related Criminal Activites-Germany.” In Money Laundering and Bank Secrecy, 158. Leiden: Kluwer Law International, n.d.

C.Jessup, Philip. A Modern Law of Nations. Bandung: Nuansa, 2012.

Fukuyama, Francis. The Origin of Political Order. New York: Farrar, Strauss and Giroux, 2011. Godoy, Joao. "Computer and Internasional Criminal Law : High Tech Crime and Criminal.”Journal of New England Internasional and Comparative 6 (n.d.).

Kelsen, Hans. General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1945.

Kusuma, M. W, 2001, Tegaknya Supremasi Hukum, Remadja Rosda, Bandng.

Leasa, E. Z. (2010). Penerapan Sanksi Pidana Sanksi Tindakan (Double Track System) Dalam Kebijakan Legislasi. Jurnal Sasi Vol. 16 No. 4 Bulan Oktober – Desember.

Marfuatul Latifah. (2016). Penunjukan Otoritas Pusat Dalam Bantuan Timbal Balik Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Negara Hukum: Vol. 7, No. 1, Juni 2016. P.51-69

Matthew H. Fleming, (2005). Asset Recovery and Its Impact on Criminal Behavior, An Economic Taxonomy: Draft for Comments, London, University College

Sutarman. (2007). Cyber Crime-Modus Operandi dan Penanggulangannya. Jogjakarta: Laksbang Pressindo.

Syahdeini, Sutan Remy. (2009). Kejahatan & Tindak Pidana Komputer. Jakarta: Pustaka Utama Grafiti.

Tianotak, Nazarudin (2011). Urgensi Cyberlaw Di Indonesia, Jurnal Sasi Vol. 17 No. 4 Bulan Oktober – Desember.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-30 — Updated on 2026-03-09

Versions