Critical Legal Studies Approach to the Governance and Effectiveness of Regional Notary Supervisory Boards in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.5729Keywords:
Critical Legal Studies, notary supervision, Regional Supervisory Council, substantive justice, regulatory reformAbstract
This study analyzes the governance and effectiveness of supervision carried out by the Regional Supervisory Council (MPD) of notaries in Indonesia through a Critical Legal Studies (CLS) perspective. As a supervisory institution, the MPD is responsible for ensuring notaries' compliance with regulations and professional codes of ethics to ensure the integrity of legal services. However, in practice, MPD supervision faces a number of challenges, including limited human resources and budget, complicated reporting procedures, and regulations that are not fully adaptive to the dynamics of the notary profession. Using the CLS approach, this study highlights that supervision tends to be too formalistic, focuses on administrative procedures, and pays little attention to aspects of substantive justice that reflect the needs of the community. This study offers a substantive justice-based approach to supervision, which involves regulatory reform, increasing the capacity of MPD members through training and certification, digitizing the reporting system, and providing preventive guidance for notaries. This approach not only aims to enforce legal formalities but also ensures responsive, inclusive, and public interest-oriented supervision. The results of the study indicate that the application of the principle of substantive justice can increase the effectiveness of supervision, minimize the potential for violations, and strengthen public trust in the legal system. This study recommends a more progressive reform of the notary supervision system, with a focus on creating a transparent, accountable and sustainable supervision mechanism.
Downloads
References
Adjie, Habib. “Konsep Notaris Mayantara Menghadapi Tantangan Persaingan Global”. Jurnal Hukum Respublica 16, no 2 (2018): 201–18. https://doi.org/10.31849/respublica.v16i2.1436.
Agustin, Ika Yuli, en Ghansham Anand. “Proposing Notaries’ Deed Digitalization in Indonesia: A Legal Perspective”. Lentera Hukum 8, no 1 (2021): 49–72. https://doi.org/10.19184/ejlh.v8i1.21375.
Anita Sinaga, Niru. “Kode Etik Sebagai Pedoman Pelaksanaan Profesi Hukum Yang Baik”. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 10, no 2 (2020): 1–34. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v10i2.460.
Bagus wibisono, Dwikky, en Umar Ma’ruf. “Peranan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) Terhadap Pengawasan Pelaksanaan Jabatan Notaris Di Kabupaten Tegal”. Jurnal Akta 5, no 1 (2018): 179. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2546.
Banakar, Reza, en Max Travers. Theory and method in socio-legal research. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2005.
Barbieri-Low, A J. “Law, State, and Society in Early Imperial China: A Study with Critical Edition and Translation of the Legal Texts from Zhangjiashan Tomb no. 247”. Sinica Leidensia, 2015. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187186970&origin=inward.
Binder, G. “Critical Legal Studies”. A Companion to Philosophy of Law and Legal Theory: Second edition, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444320114.ch16.
Dai, B. “Evaluation Model of Cross-Chain Notary Mechanism Based on Improved PageRank Algorithm”. Jisuanji Gongcheng/Computer Engineering 47, no 2 (2021): 26–31. https://doi.org/10.19678/j.issn.1000-3428.0056460.
Dharmawan, Ariel Doni, en Maryanto Maryanto. “Kekuatan Hukum Sertifikat Hak Tanggungan Dalam Hal Musnahnya Obyek Hak Tanggungan Karena Bencana Alam Di Kabupaten Grobogan”. Jurnal Akta 5, no 1 (2018): 167. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2545.
Donald, Henry Lbn Toruan. “Legalitas Keberadaan Majelis Pengawas Notaris dan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris”. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no 3 (2020): 435. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2020.v20.435-458.
Esfandiari, F, en A E Widianto. “Pancasila Legal System: Balancing The Fulfillment Of National Moral Values And Law Enforcement In Indonesia”. Indonesian Journal of Law and …, 2024. https://ijler.umsida.ac.id/index.php/ijler/article/view/999.
Handayani, Tri Ulfi, en Anis Mashdurohatun. “Urgensi Dewan Kehormatan Notaris Dalam Penegakan Kode Etik Notaris Di Kabupaten Pati”. Jurnal Akta 5, no 1 (2018): 51. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i1.2531.
Herbeck, D. “Critical Legal Studies and argumentation theory”. Argumentation 9, no 5 (1995): 719–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00744752.
Iain, S. “Critical legal studies in french”. French Studies Bulletin 23, no 1 (1987): 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1093/frebul/7.23.1.
Iryadi, Irfan. “Kedudukan Akta Otentik dalam Hubungannya dengan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara”. Jurnal Konstitusi 15, no 4 (2019): 796. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1546.
Jeremiah. “Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Notaris Oleh Majelis Pengawas Daerah Notaris Di Kota Salatiga”, 2008, 1–82.
KUNTJORO, NEKY. “Efektivitas Pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Daerah (MPD) Kota Yogyakarta Terhadap Perilaku Notaris di Kota Yogyakarta menurut Kode Etik Notaris”. Jurnal Lex Renaissance 1, no 2 (2016): 201–15. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol1.iss2.art5.
Kweenedy, Cynthia. “Penolakan Pencatatan Perkawinan Oleh Kantor Dinas Kependudukan Dan Catatan Sipil Akibat Terbitnya Akta Pembatalan Perkawinan”. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education. Lembaga Penelitian dan Pendidikan (LPP) Mandala, 2021. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v7i1.1750.
Lutviandany, Auly, Fifiana Wisnaeni, en Irma Cahyaningtyas. “Pelaksanaan Pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Terhadap Kode Etik Notaris Di Kabupaten Grobogan”. Notarius 14, no 2 (2021): 723–37. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v14i2.43724.
Madyastuti, Ratna. “Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Notaris Dalam Pencegahan Terjadinya Pelanggaran Kewenangan Dan Tugas Jabatan Notaris”. Jurnal Lex Renaissance 5, no 3 (2020): 711–29. https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol5.iss3.art13.
Margarita, V K. “Notary tariff: Problems of ensuring constitutional balance in determining parameters”. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo Universiteta. Pravo 15, no 3 (2024): 592–603. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu14.2024.303.
Maryana, Rosi, Endang Purwaningsih, en Irwan Santosa. “Peran Serta Notaris Dalam Pelaporan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Pendanaan Tindak Pidana Terorisme Di Era 4.0 Dan 5.0”. Jurnal Res Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 3, no 1 (2023): 131–46. https://www.resjustitia.lppmbinabangsa.id/index.php/home/article/view/62.
Muammar Khadafi, Iskandar Muda, en Irwan Santosa. “Implementasi Hukum Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa Dilaksanakan Notaris Terhadap Pelaporan Transaksi Keuangan Mencurigakan Melalui Aplikasi Go-AML Berdasarkan Peraturan PPATK Nomor 3 Tahun 2021”. Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains 2, no 09 (2023): 739–51. https://doi.org/10.58812/jhhws.v2i09.614.
Muhaimin. “Responsibilities of Regional Supervisor Toward Notary Protocols From Other Notaries Which Have Been Aged Twenty-Five Years or More”. Journal of Law, Policy and Globalization, 2020. https://doi.org/10.7176/jlpg/98-10.
Nindiasari, Septian Putri, Dominikus Rato, en Moh. Ali. “Peran Notaris Dalam Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Atas Pembuatan Perjanjian Perkawinan Setelah Perkawinan Berlangsung”. Mimbar Yustitia. Universitas Islam Darul Ulum Lamongan, 2022. https://doi.org/10.52166/mimbar.v6i2.3655.
Norman, Mutia Karina. “Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa ( Pmpj ) Bagi Notaris Dalam Rangka Mutual Evaluation Review ( Mer ) Financial Action Task Force ( Fatf ) Terhadap Indonesia”. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan) 7, no 1 (2023): 824–33. https://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/article/view/4086%0Ahttps://ejournal.mandalanursa.org/index.php/JISIP/article/viewFile/4086/3861.
Piñas, L F Piñas. “An Intelligent Fusion Framework for Risk Assessment of Notarial Activities in the Digital Era: Balancing Speed and Legal Security with ICT”. Fusion: Practice and Applications 15, no 1 (2024): 205–13. https://doi.org/10.54216/FPA.150116.
Sadewa, Muhammad Agung Sapta. “Peran Majelis Pengawasan Daerah (MPD) Dalam Melakukan Pengawasan Terhadap Administrasi Nootaris Di Kota Palembang”. Frontiers in Neuroscience. Universitas Sriwijaya Palembang, 2021.
Sambira, Yuli. “Sanctions Mechanism for Notary Who Break the Code of Ethics”. Sultan Agung Notary Law Review 2, no 3 (2020): 272. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.3.272-281.
Samosir, Kristiana Meinalita. “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Kewenangan Pengawasan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Notaris Terhadap Notaris di Kota Pontianak”. Jurnal Nestor Magister Hukum, 2004. https://www.neliti.com/publications/10571/efektivitas-pelaksanaan-kewenangan-pengawasan-majelis-pengawas-daerah-notaris-te.
SH.,CN, Djoko Sukisno. Tanggung jawab notaris selaku pejabat umum dalam menjalankan tugas jabatannya. Center of Documentation and Studies of Bussines Law, Yogyakarta. Yogyakarta, 2003. http://etd.ugm.ac.id/index.php?mod=penelitian_detail&sub=PenelitianDetail&act=view&typ=html&buku_id=21229.
Stewart, J G. “Demystifying cls: A critical legal studies family tree”. Adelaide Law Review 41, no 1 (2020): 121–48. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85089592229&origin=inward.
Stewart, J Gilchrist. “CLS is Haunted! A Perspective on Contemporary Critical Legal Studies”. Law and Literature 32, no 1 (2020): 135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1535685X.2019.1635358.
Suriadiredja, Shalahuddin, en Mohamad Fajri Mekka Putra. “Penunjukan Notaris Sebagai Pihak Pelapor Dan Kewajiban Menerapkan Prinsip Mengenali Pengguna Jasa Serta Implikasinya Terhadap Kepastian Hukum”. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum (JKH) 8, no 1 (2022): 95–114. https://doi.org/10.23887/jkh.v8i1.43876.
Suwardi, Suwardi. “the Synchronization Necessary of Notary Supervision By Notary Supervisory and Honour Council”. Jurnal Akta 8, no 2 (2021): 100. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v8i2.14163.
Tedjosaputro, L. Keadilan dan Masyarakat Aplikasi Hukum Profesi Notaris dalam Kehidupan. BUTTERFLY MAMOLI PRESS, 2021. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en%5C&lr=%5C&id=jRItEAAAQBAJ%5C&oi=fnd%5C&pg=PA15%5C&dq=notaris%5C&ots=q7U6kbOu74%5C&sig=5YVAEf2Hiwdc0gOYb4wQgriOh1E.
Unnever, J D. “Formal versus Substantive Justice: The Legislative History of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977”. Capitalism Nature Socialism 6, no 3 (1995): 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10455759509358643.
Verdyandika, Dwi Kukuh, Shinta Hadiyantina, en Endang Sri Kawuryan. “Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Daerah Notaris terhadap Protokol Notaris yang Telah Berumur 25 Tahun atau Lebih”. Jurnal Mercatoria, 2021. https://doi.org/10.31289/mercatoria.v14i2.5559.
Wang, J. “Cross-chain Supervision Mechanism of Distributed Notaries for Consortium Blockchain”. 2023 6th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data, ICAIBD 2023, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD57115.2023.10206042.
Woś, T. “Systemic position of the notary under the first polish law on notaries of 27 october 1933. Part two”. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 30, no 4 (2021): 573–92. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.4.573-592.
Yetniwati. “Legal Constructions of Apprenticeship for Notary Candidates in the Framework of Rechtsidee”. Jambe Law Journal 4, no 1 (2021): 93–110. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.4.1.93-110.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Rindiana Larasati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
