Principle of Beneficial Owner in Corporate Crime

Muhammad Saleh; Abdul Jabar Rahim; arifai

doi:10.31941/pj.v24i1.5879

Authors

Muhammad Saleh Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
Abdul Jabar Rahim Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari
arifai Universitas Muhammadiyah Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.5879

Keywords:

Principle of Beneficial Owner, Corporate Crime

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of the principle of beneficial owners in corporate crimes in Indonesia. The background of this research focuses on the challenges of identifying beneficial owners within corporate structures that are often used to commit crimes, including money laundering and corruption. The method used is normative legal research with a juridical approach, where data is collected from laws and regulations and case studies. The results show that although the principle of beneficial owners has been regulated in positive law, its implementation is still not effective. This is due to a lack of understanding and compliance from corporations as well as weaknesses in supervision by the relevant authorities. This study recommends the need for reforms in regulations and increased supervisory capacity to ensure that beneficial owners can be identified and held legally accountable in cases of corporate crimes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Law

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 2010 tentang Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris

Journal

Achmad Sofwan Mustafiddin, Ferry Adi Jaya, Lina Susiana, and Susanawati. “Analisis Yuridis Penjatuhan Pidana Terhadap Korporasi Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya Nomor 95/Pid.Sus-TPK/2019/PN Sby).” Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains 6, no. 1 (January 31, 2023): 79–89. doi:10.56338/jks.v6i1.3259.

Agustianto. “Pentingnya Transparansi Beneficial Ownership Oleh Korporasi.” JUSTISI 8, no. 2 (May 21, 2022): 108–18. doi:10.33506/js.v8i2.1678.

Alhakim, Abdurrakhman, and Eko Soponyono. “Kebijakan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Terhadap Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 3 (September 24, 2019): 322–36. doi:10.14710/jphi.v1i3.322-336.

Amirullah, Amirullah. “Korporasi Dalam Perspektif Subyek Hukum Pidana.” Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundangan Islam 2, no. 2 (October 1, 2012): 139–60. doi:10.15642/ad.2012.2.2.139-160.

Ariani, Nevey Varida. “Beneficial Owner: Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat Dalam Tindak Pidana Korporasi.” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 1 (March 23, 2020): 71. doi:10.30641/dejure.2020.V20.71-84.

Arifin, Ridwan, and Shafa Amalia Choirinnisa. “Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dalam Prinsip Hukum Pidana Indonesia (Corporate Responsibility on Money Laundering Crimes on Indonesian Criminal Law Principle).” JURNAL MERCATORIA 12, no. 1 (June 25, 2019): 43. doi:10.31289/mercatoria.v12i1.2349.

Disemadi, Hari Sitra, and Nyoman Serikat Putra Jaya. “Perkembangan Pengaturan Korporasi Sebagai Subjek Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Media Bhakti 3, no. 2 (November 3, 2019): 118–27. doi:10.32501/jhmb.v3i2.80.

Fernando. “Limited Company Beneficial Owner Liability in Criminal Acts of Corruption,” 2021. doi:10.2991/assehr.k.211223.094.

Hiariej, Eddy O. S. “KORUPSI DI SEKTOR SWASTA DAN TANGGUNG JAWAB PIDANA KORPORASI.” Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, no. 4 (October 29, 2020): 333–44. doi:10.14710/mmh.49.4.2020.333-344.

Kristina, Michelle. “Strengthening Corporate Crime Prevention In The Digital Economy In ASEAN.” JURNAL YUSTIKA: MEDIA HUKUM DAN KEADILAN 26, no. 02 (June 26, 2024): 120–31. doi:10.24123/yustika.v26i02.6618.

LAWRENCE, VELLICHIA. “Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Notaris Dalam Mengungkapkan Pemilik Manfaat (Beneficial Ownership) Dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris.” Jurnal Perspektif Hukum 2, no. 1 (March 19, 2021): 15–25. doi:10.35447/jph.v2i1.269.

Listawati, Listawati. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Justitia et Pax 37, no. 2 (December 22, 2021). doi:10.24002/jep.v37i2.4412.

Murtadha, Teuku Ulya, Dahlan Ali, and Mohd Din. “Kewajiban Notaris Melaporkan Transaksi Mencurigakan Dalam Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Syiah Kuala Law Journal 3, no. 3 (December 30, 2019): 364–79. doi:10.24815/sklj.v3i3.12486.

Pakpahan, Kartina, Maggie Maggie, Christian Agung Prawito, and Wico Dwi Pratama. “Prinsip Notaris Dalam Pengenalan Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang.” Ilmu Hukum Prima (IHP) 3, no. 1 (October 3, 2020). doi:10.34012/jihap.v3i1.929.

Qotrannadha, Desya, and Hanafi Tanawijaya. “Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Yang Penghadapnya Menggunakan Identitas Palsu.” Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 8, no. 5 (May 12, 2023): 3188–97. doi:10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i5.11804.

Rodliyah, Rodliyah, Any Suryani, and Lalu Husni. “Konsep Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi (Corporate Crime) Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia.” Journal Kompilasi Hukum 5, no. 1 (February 9, 2021): 191–206. doi:10.29303/jkh.v5i1.43.

Rustan, Ahmad, Ju Lan Hsieh, and Wahyudi Umar. “Maladministration on Mining Business Licenses: Case Study “Mining Business License Production Operation PT. Aneka Tambang, Tbk.” Varia Justicia 17, no. 03 (2021): 246–57.

Suhartati, Suhartati. “Penerapan Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Pembuatan Akta Otentik Pada Kantor Notaris Kabupaten Gowa.” PETITUM 8, no. 2 (October 29, 2020): 187–97. doi:10.36090/jh.v8i2.819.

Sunanda, Deddy, Topo Santoso, Eva Achjani Zulfa, and Muhammad Yusuf. “Concept of Benefit Owner’s Responsibility in Crime in Indonesia: Charging Criminal Actors Behind Corporates.” International Journal of Engineering Business and Social Science 1, no. 05 (May 8, 2023): 363–71. doi:10.58451/ijebss.v1i05.62.

Sunarti, S, Maya Damayanti, Landung Esariti, Mardwi Rahdriawan, and Novia Cecilia Medina. “Tantangan Pengembangan Wisata Berdasarkan Dinamika Partisipasi Masyarakat Desa Montongsari, Kabupaten Kendal.” Jurnal Pembangunan Wilayah Dan Kota 18, no. 4 (December 31, 2022): 367–80. doi:10.14710/pwk.v18i4.49740.

Nyulistiowati Suryanti. “Notaris Dalam Penerapan Prinsip Mengenali Pemilik Manfaat Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Perjanjian Nominee.” Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An 4, no. 1 (December 31, 2020): 369–77. doi:10.23920/acta.v4i1.367.