LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF NOT DELETING A REGISTERED FIDUCIARY SECURITY IN THE ONLINE SYSTEM IN BALI PROVINCE

Kadek De Adnyana; Ketut Sukawati P Perbawa; Lis Julianti; Putu Lantika Oka Permadhi

doi:10.31941/pj.v24i1.5895

Authors

Kadek De Adnyana Faculty of Law Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
Ketut Sukawati P Perbawa Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
Lis Julianti Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
Putu Lantika Oka Permadhi Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.5895

Keywords:

Fiduciary Guarantee; Deletion; Online System

Abstract

This research analyzes the legal consequences of not removing Fiduciary guarantees registered in the online system in the province of Bali. The implementation of the elimination of Fiduciary guarantees registered in the online system is the obligation of Fiduciary recipients as creditors, this provision is regulated in Article 16 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation Number 21 of 2015 concerning Procedures for Registration of Fiduciary Guarantees And the cost of making a Fiduciary Guarantee Deed. However, in practice there are still fiduciary recipients, namely creditors who do not fulfill their obligations to abolish the fiduciary guarantee after the fiduciary giver, namely the debtor, has fulfilled all his achievements. There is no sanction that regulates related if the Fiduciary recipient does not eliminate the Fiduciary guarantee which results in this obligation being disobeyed. The study of this research is related to the implementation of the elimination of Fiduciary guarantees registered in the online system and the legal consequences of the negligence of the Fiduciary recipients for not notifying the Fiduciary guarantee deletion to the Minister registered in the online system. The method used is an empirical legal research method. The analytical knife of legal issues in this thesis is the theory of legal effectiveness, the theory of legal certainty and the theory of legal protection. The results that can be concluded in this study are if the Fiduciary recipient, his proxy or his representative does not notify the removal of the Fiduciary guarantee, then the Fiduciary guarantee concerned cannot be re-registered.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Books

Ade Saptomo, 2009, Pokok-Pokok Metodelodi Penelitian Hukum Empiris Muri Sebuah Alternatif, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta.

Amiruddin dan Zainal Asikin, 2012, Pengantar Metode Penelitian Hukum, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Andreas Albertus Audi Prajitno, 2010, Hukum Fidusia, Selaras, Semarang.

Bachsan Mustafa, 2003, Sistem Hukum Indonesia Terpadu, PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Bonaraja Purba, Muhammad Fitri Rahmadana, Edwin Basmar, Diana Purnama Sari, Antonia Klara, Darwin

Budi Untung, 2000, Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia, Andi, Yogyakarta.

Damanik, Annisa Ilmi Faried, Darwin Lie, Nadia Fariza, Noni Rozaini, Rahman Tanjung,

Desak Putu Dewi Kasih, 2014, Tanggung Jawab Notaris Terhadap Akta Jaminan Fidusia Yang Pendaftarannya Melalui Sistem Cybernotary, Penelitian Magister

Erlies Setiana Nurbani, 2013, Penerapan Teori Hukum pada Penelitian Tesis dan Disertasi, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Eugenia Liliawati Muljono, 2003, Pemberian Kredit Oleh Perbangkan, Harvaindo, Jakarta.

Frieda Husni Hasibullah, 2009, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata, Hak-hak yang Memberi Jaminan Jilid 2, Indhill Co, Jakarta.

Frieda Husni Hasbullah, 2002, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata Hak-Hak Yang Memberi Jaminan Jilid 2, Indo. Hill, Jakarta.

Frieda Husni Hasibullah, 2005, Hukum Kebendaan Perdata, Indhill Co, Jakarta.

Gatot Supramono, 2009, Perbankan dan Masalah Kredit Suatu Tinjauan Bidang Yuridis, PT. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Gunawan Widjaja & Ahmad Yani, 2000, Jaminan Fidusia, Jakarta, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Gunawan Widjaya, et.all, 2007, Jaminan Fidusia, PT. Raja Grafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Hans Kelsen, 2006, Teori Umum tentang Hukum dan Negara, Nusa Media, Bandung.

Nur Arif Nugraha, 2021, Ekonomi Pembangunan, Yayasan Kita Menulis, Jakarta.

Journal Articles

Ahmad Sanusi, 2013, Pendaftaran Jaminan Fidusia dan Akibat Hukumnya, Jurnal Ilmiah kebijakan hukum Vol 7 (1), Pusat Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Kebijakan Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI.

John W. Creswell, 1998, Research Design: Qualitative and Quantitative Approach, Sage Publication, London.

Kosasih, J. I., Agung, A. A. I., & Dewi, A. A. S. L., 2022, Parate Eksekusi Pasca Putusan Mahkamah Kostitusi (MK) NO. 18/PUU-XVII/2019 Dan No: 02/PUU-XIX/2021 Terhadap Eksekusi Jaminan Fidusia Atas Lembaga Pembiayaan Leasin, Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 10(1)

Sujana, I. N., & Wesna, P. A. S., 2020, Peningkatan Kesadaran Hukum Masyarakat Desa Adat Kukuh Karangasem Terhadap Dampak Covid-19 Dalam Penyelesaian Kredit Bermasalah Pada Praktek Lembaga Perkreditan Desa, Community Service Journal (CSJ), 3(1), 42-49

Legislation

The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia

The Civil Code

Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Security (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1999 No. 168)

Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 9 of 2013 on the Implementation of Electronic Fiduciary Security Registration (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2013 No. 418)

Law No. 42 of 1999 on Fiduciary Security (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 1999 No. 168)

Minister of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 9 of 2013 on the Implementation of Electronic Fiduciary Security Registration (State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia Year 2013 No. 418)