Comparative Analysis of the Implementation of Small-Scale Government Cooperation with Business Entities (KPBU): A Comparative Study between Indonesia and South Korea in the Perspective of Efficiency, Regulation, and Sustainability

Authors

  • Kurdi Kurdi Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Indonesia
  • Prita Amalia Faculty of Law, Universitas Padjadjaran, Jatinangor, Indonesia
  • Yuki Mahardhito Adhitya Wardhana Faculty of Law, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.5947

Keywords:

Government Cooperation with Business Entities; Regulation; Comparative Law; Indonesia-Korea; Economic Cooperation

Abstract

Public-Private Partnership (PPP) is a common scheme used in infrastructure development in Indonesia, with the main legal basis in Presidential Regulation Number 38 of 2015 and its derivative regulations, such as Regulation of the Minister of PPN/Head of Bappenas Number 7 of 2023. Although this regulation provides legal certainty, the implementation of Small-Scale PPP still faces obstacles, especially in the clarity of project boundaries, variations in financing methods, and immature evaluation mechanisms. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Small-Scale PPP in Indonesia through a comparative study with South Korea, which has clearer and more flexible regulations and more varied financing options, including the Build-Transfer-Lease (BTL) scheme. Using normative legal methods through a comparative approach, legislation, and conceptual, this study identifies differences in PPP regulations and practices in the two countries to evaluate the effectiveness of the policies implemented. The results of this study are expected to provide recommendations for updating PPP regulations in Indonesia in order to increase legal certainty, regulatory effectiveness, and investment attractiveness in a Small-Scale PPP scheme that is more stable and has more legal certainty

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbarokah. (2024, July 12). Target Pertumbuhan Ekonomi 5,6% di 2025: Ambisius atau Realistis? Ekonompedia.Com. https://ekonompedia.com/target-pertumbuhan-ekonomi-56-di-2025-ambisius-atau-realistis/

Anggraeni, R., & Sari, I. M. (2020). MENGUNGKAP MATERI MUATAN PERATURAN PRESIDEN NOMOR 38 TAHUN 2015 TENTANG PERJANJIAN KERJASAMA PEMERINTAH DAN BADAN USAHA DALAM PENYEDIAAN INFRASTRUKTUR. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 49(2), 125–135. https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.49.2.2020.125-135

Benuf, K., & Azhar, M. (2020). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum sebagai Instrumen Mengurai Permasalahan Hukum Kontemporer. Gema Keadilan, 7(1), 20–33. https://doi.org/10.14710/gk.2020.7504

Elena, M. (2024, January 24). Tahun Politik, Bahlil Pede Target Investasi 2024 Rp1.650 Triliun Tercapai. Bisnis.Com. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/20240124/9/1735206/tahun-politik-bahlil-pede-target-investasi-2024-rp1650-triliun-tercapai

Hayati, N. N. S., Warjiyati, S., & Muwahid. (2021). Analisis Yuridis Konsep Omnibus Law dalam Harmonisasi Peraturan Perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan, 16(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.33059/jhsk.v16i1.2631

Hijriani, M. Yusuf, Winner A. Siregar, & Sopian. (2022). Perkembangan Teori Penegakan Hukum dalam Perwujudan Fungsi Norma di Masyarakat. Sultra Research of Law, 5(2), 58–65. https://doi.org/10.54297/surel.v5i2.62

Kazemi, M., Tabatabaei, S. S., & Moslemi, N. (2023). A novel public-private partnership to increase the penetration of energy storage systems in distribution level. Journal of Energy Storage, 62, 106851. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2023.106851

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat. (2022). Informasi Statistik Infrastruktur. Pusat Data dan Teknologi Informasi, Sekretariat Jenderal, Kementerian PUPR.

Kementerian Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. (2025). KPBU Balance Sheet. Pembiayaan.Pu.Go.Id. https://pembiayaan.pu.go.id/

Kim, S., & Choi, Y. (2023). A comparative study of the adoption of public-private partnerships for water services in South Korea and Singapore. Public Administration and Policy, 26(2), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAP-08-2022-0091

Ku, S., Jo, H., Sim, J., & Moon, W.-S. (2024). Competitive performance of public–private partnerships: unsolicited proposal projects and tendering rules in South Korea. Construction Management and Economics, 42(8), 714–740. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2024.2314084

Kurdi, K. (2024). Implementation Of Public-Private Partnership Of Lhok Guci Project Viewed From The Perspective Of Investment Law And Financing Law. JURNAL HUKUM SEHASEN, 10(1), 247 – 254. https://doi.org/10.37676/jhs.v10i1.5944

Kurdi, & Syafitri, C. Z. (2024). Analisis Pelaksanaan KPBU Skala Kecil Dengan Perspektif Manajemen Perubahan Sektor Publik. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 12093–12101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2142

Oktaviyanti, A., Taufiq, A., & Suhindarno, H. (2024). Collaborative Governance in Efforts to Reduce Stunting in Bojonegoro Regency. Jurnal Noken: Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 10(2 SE-Articles), 481–493. https://doi.org/10.33506/jn.v10i2.3822

Public–Private Partnership Monitor: Indonesia. (2021). https://doi.org/10.22617/SGP210069-2

Ryu, S., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2022). Determinants of capital spending in local governments of South Korea. International Review of Public Administration, 27(4), 344–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2022.2152570

Setiadi, W. (2020). SIMPLIFIKASI REGULASI DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE PENDEKATAN OMNIBUS LAW. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 9(1), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.408

Suhendra, E. N. S. M., Prabowo, S., & Handayani, D. (2021). Dinamika Penyiapan Proyek Kerja Sama Pemerintah dan Badan Usaha di Indonesia. ElexMediaKomputindo.

Yusuf, M., & Wibowo, B. (2024). Pembiayaan Infrastruktur Dengan Skema Kerja Sama Pemerintah dan Badan Usaha Pada Proyek Preservasi Jalan Lintas Timur Sumatera Oleh PT Adhi Jalintim Riau. Jesya (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Ekonomi Syariah), 7(2), 2110–2120. https://doi.org/10.36778/jesya.v7i2.1713

Zaw, S. L. Y., & Likhitruangsilp, V. (2024). An Analytical Network Process (ANP) Model for Choosing Optimal Public–Private Partnership (PPP) Contract Types for Infrastructure Projects (pp. 1019–1030). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-4049-3_78

Downloads

Published

2025-03-18