Science of Delivery: An Agricultural Development Approach

Authors

  • Oktavianus Mbaku Muku Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Djuara P. Lubis Department of Communication and Community Development Sciences, Faculty of Ecology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Rilus Department of Communication and Community Development Sciences, Faculty of Ecology, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
  • Hermanu Departement of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6270

Keywords:

science of delivery, local knowledge, innovation, delivery system, knowledge system

Abstract

Agricultural development in many developing countries continues to face multifaceted challenges, particularly in the effectiveness of delivering innovations to farmers and in bridging the gap between local knowledge and research-based scientific understanding. Often, top-down approaches overlook the rich, contextual wisdom embedded within local farming communities, resulting in innovations that are either poorly adopted or unsustainable in the long term. This study explores how the integration of local knowledge with formal scientific research can be achieved through effective delivery and sharing systems. Adopting a constructivist paradigm, the research employed a qualitative case study approach, drawing on data collected from in-depth interviews, focus group discussions, direct observations, and document analysis. Key informants included experienced farmers, community leaders, agricultural extension workers, and local government staff. The analysis was conducted using NVivo 12 Plus software to identify meaningful patterns and themes. The results suggest that when scientific innovations are co-developed with input from local knowledge, they are not only more relevant and adaptable but also culturally accepted—what this study refers to as "culturally rooted innovations." Such integration not only helps safeguard agroecological systems but also builds mutual understanding and trust among stakeholders. This study highlights the importance of participatory knowledge-sharing models and localized delivery systems as essential components in designing more sustainable and inclusive agricultural development strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arianto, D., Sumaryanto, T., & Hidayat, N. (2022). Local knowledge and agricultural innovation in dryland areas. Journal of Agrarian Studies, 17(2), 135–150.

Bacon, F. (1597). Meditationes Sacrae and Human Philosophy.

Berkes, F. (2020). Sacred ecology (4th ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429504181

Catford, J. (2009). Turning the world upside down: The search for global health in the 21st century. Health Promotion International, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap001

Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (2020). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. IDS Discussion Paper 296. https://doi.org/10.19088/1968-2020.001

Creswell, J. W. (2023). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Darmawan, A., Kusuma, R., & Fitrani, E. (2020). Geographic and climatic analysis of East Sumba in agricultural planning. Indonesian Journal of Environmental Science, 15(1), 21–30.

Davenport, T. H., & Laurence, P. (1998). Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Harvard Business Press.

Fakhlina, N. (2023). Manajemen pengetahuan dalam organisasi: Teori dan praktik. Jakarta: Prenada Media.

Haba, J., Lerebulan, A., & Suharno. (2021). Geographical constraints and water resource management in East Sumba. Jurnal Tata Ruang Wilayah, 12(2), 45–60.

Lopolito, A., Giannoccaro, G., & Prosperi, M. (2022). Policy design for innovation in agriculture: The role of local knowledge. Agricultural Systems, 197, 103306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2021.103306

Muswar, M. (2009). Agroekologi dan kemandirian petani dalam pembangunan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Pertanian, 6(2), 99–106.

Ngugi, M. W., Isinika, A., & Temu, A. (2021). Farmer innovation systems and participatory research in Sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension, 27(4), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1080/1389224X.2020.1858890

Palacpac, R. D., & Flor, A. G. (2021). Knowledge sharing and social capital in agricultural communities. International Journal of Knowledge Management Studies, 12(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJKMS.2021.118765

Syuaib, M. F. (2016). Sustainable agriculture in Indonesia: Facts and challenges to keep growing in harmony with the environment. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 9, 57–63.

Tamtomo, D. (2020). Pertanian organik sebagai solusi kerusakan lingkungan. Jurnal Ekologi dan Pembangunan, 13(1), 88–96.

Turner, N. J., Ignace, M. B., & Ignace, R. (2020). Traditional ecological knowledge and wisdom of aboriginal peoples in British Columbia. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1275–1287. https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1275:TEKAWO]2.0.CO;2

Verschuren, P., & Doorewaard, H. (2017). Designing a research project (3rd ed.). Eleven International Publishing.

von Braun, J., Afsana, K., Fresco, L. O., & Hassan, M. (2023). Food systems: Transformation for sustainable development. Nature Food, 4(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43016-022-00683-0

Widiyanto, A. (2021). Dampak revolusi hijau terhadap keragaman hayati pertanian di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Pertanian Indonesia, 26(3), 147–154.

Woha, R. (2008). Deliberative traditions in East Sumba: Local wisdom in conflict resolution. Jurnal Antropologi Indonesia, 29(2), 101–113.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-23