Accountability of Land Deed Officials (PPAT) in Overcoming Duplicate and Overlapping Certificates in Indonesia

Authors

  • Fitra Rahmadani Universitas Pancasila Jakarta
  • Fotri Apik Rakhmawati Universitas Pancasila Jakarta
  • Noor Hidayah Universitas Pancasila Jakarta
  • Tetti Samosir Universitas Pancasila Jakarta
  • St. Muslimah Suciati Universitas Halu Oleo, Kendari

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.6280

Keywords:

Land Law, Legal Responsibility, PPAT, Double Certificates, Overlapping Land.

Abstract

The formation of the problem of double or overlapping certificates in Indonesia is a crucial issue caused by various factors, such as weak land administration systems, invalid data, lack of physical verification, and inaccurate land boundary mapping. This study aims to analyze the factors that cause double and overlapping land certificates in Indonesia and efforts to provide legal accountability for PPATs related to the existence of double and overlapping land certificates in Indonesia. This study is a juridical-normative study with a conceptual and legislative approach. The results of the study confirm that the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT) has legal responsibility for errors or violations committed, both in administrative, civil, and criminal aspects. The level of error of PPAT in issuing deeds related to double or overlapping certificates is the basis for determining the form of legal accountability that can be imposed. Therefore, supervision and law enforcement of PPATs are very important to ensure legal certainty and maintain public trust in land transactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, S. (2023). Batasan Kewenangan dan Tanggung Jawab Notaris-PPAT dalam Edukasi Prosedur Pembuatan Akta Otentik Ditinjau dari Pasal 51 KUHP. Journal of Education Research, 4(1), 67–72.

Adikara, G. J. (2022). Framing of local media in the management issues of Sultan Ground and Pakualaman Ground in Yogyakarta. Journal of Social Studies (JSS), 18(1), 81–100. https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v18i1.48945

Alfared, R., & Ayunda, R. (2023). Peranan Notaris Dalam Pemecahan Sertifikat Tanah Warisan. Jurnal Rectum: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana, 5(1), 1069. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.2899

Anwar, S. (2020). Urgency of Waqf Land Registration in the Context of Indonesian Land Reform. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 1(3), 479–492. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v1i3.38216

Ardiansyah, D., Mahdurohatun, A., & Chalim, M. A. (2021). A Making Authentic Deed of Distribution of Inheritance to Land by a Notary Public. Jurnal Akta, 8(1), 25–33. https://media.neliti.com/media/publications/446906-a-making-authentic-deed-of-distribution-fa2ed299.pdf

Ariansyah, M. D., & Anggriani, R. (2022). Sengketa Sertipikat Ganda Akibat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Media of Law and Sharia, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18196/mls.v4i1.16829

Artaji, A., Sulistiani, L., Rajamanicam, R., & Fakhriah, E. L. (2024). Resolution of Agrarian Conflicts on Plantation Land through Restorative Justice in Indonesia. Lex Scientia Law Review, 8(1), 107–136. https://doi.org/10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14060

Bhawika Wimala Pastika, D., Aprilia, D., Yuslani Eoh, S., & Zoe Faith, B. (2022). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Sertipikat Hak Atas Tanah Yang Dibalik Nama Tanpa Persetujuan Pemegang Hak (Studi Kasus: Mafia Tanah ART Nirina Zubir). Gorontalo Law Review, 5(1), 212–227.

Bima Saputra, Shinta Hadiyantina, R. S. (2025). Authority of Administrative Court in Establishing Administrative Sanctions for Local Government Officials Who Do Not Implement Administrative Court Verdict. International Journal of Business, Law, and Education, 6(1), 488–498.

Cahyaningrum, D. (2022). Hak Pengelolaan Tanah Ulayat Masyarakat Hukum Adat untuk Kepentingan Investasi. Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan, 12(1), 21–39.

Damanik, P. (2023). Strengthening Land Law Reforms through Legal Pluralism in Indonesia. Rechtsidee, 11(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.21070/jihr.v12i2.993

Diane, Z., Farel, Z., Ari, A., Program, L. S., Law, F., Lampung, U. B., & City, B. (2024). A House Purchase Transaction That Has Been Paid in Full But the Sale and Purchase Deed Has Not Been Executed by PPAT , Resulting in Losses for the Buyer ( Case Study Number : 15 / Pdt . G / 2023 / PN . Gdt ). International Journal of Religion Education and Law, 3(1), 26–35.

Diantha, I. M. P. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif dalam Justifikasi Teori Hukum. Kencana.

Efendi, A’an, Dyah Ochtorina Susanti, R. I. T. (2019). Penelitian Hukum Doktrinal. LaksBang Justitia.

Elbert, Fernando, G. (2021). Analisa Hukum Atas Tanah Hak Milik Yang Terlantar Berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah No. 20 Tahun 2021 Tentang Penerbitan Kawasan Dan Tanah Terlantar. Adigama, 4(2), 2945–2968.

Fazira, F., & Khaidir, A. (2022). Efektivitas Implementasi Kebijakan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) di Badan Pertanahan Nasional (BPN) Kabupaten Pasaman. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 6(2), 16720–16726. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/5088%0Ahttps://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/download/5088/4337

Fuad, A. N., & Erowati, D. (2019). Pengawasan Ombudsman Republik Indonesia Perwakilan Jawa Tengah Terhadap Maladministrasi Pungutan Liar Program Nasional Agraria di Kabupaten Kudus Tahun 2017. Jurnal Penelitian, 13(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.21043/jp.v13i1.5404

Ginting, D. (2020). Policies on prevention and eradication of land Mafia: Agrarian reform in Indonesia. Utopia y Praxis Latinoamericana, 25(Extra2), 255–263. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3809387

Gunanegara, G. (2022). Kebijakan Negara Pada Pengaturan Hak Atas Tanah Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 161–184. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2022.v6.i2.p161-184

Judijanto, L., Utama, A. S., Sahib, A., Sumarna, M. I., & Zulfikar, M. R. (2024). Comparative Analysis of the Use of Customary Law in Land Dispute Resolution: Case Study Approach. Rechtsnormen Journal of Law, 2(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.55849/rjl.v2i2.796

Krismantoro, D. (2022a). Kebijakan Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Mafia Tanah : Reforma Agraria di Indonesia. Kewarganegaraan, 6(3), 6031–6042.

Krismantoro, D. (2022b). Sejarah dan Perkembangan Hukum Agraria di Indonesia Dalam Memberikan Keadilan Bagi Masyarakat. Ijd-Demos, 4(2), 880–889. https://doi.org/10.37950/ijd.v4i2.287

Lestari, I. P., Yunani, A., & Hidayat, Y. (2022). Implementation of the Agrarian Reform Program Through Land Redistribution in the Effort to Increase the welfare of the Community of the Village of Tinggiran Darat, Mekarsari District, Barito Kuala. Journal of Development Studies, 1(1), 13–26.

Lulu Fitriani, Muhammad Sofyan Pulungan, I. W. S. (2021). Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Pemegang Hak Milik Dalam Penerbitan Sertipikat Tanah Ganda Pada Satu Bidang Tanah. Unnes Law Review, 4(1), 48–63. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v4i1

Moechthar, O. (2024). Hukum Kenotariatan: Teknik Pembuatan Akta Notaris dan PPAT. Kencana.

Muh. Fajri Nurahmin, Maisa, & Muh. Rizki Syafaat. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah Hak Milik Bersertifikat melalui Mediasi oleh Badan Pertanahan Nasional Kota Palu. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 4(6), 330–336. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v4i6.1919

Nurahmani, Aditya Robi Rismansyah, M. (2020). Analisis Pengaturan Kebijakan Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap Sebagai Upaya Percepatan Reforma Agraria. Padjadjaran Law Review, 8(1), 1–19.

Nurhayati, S., Medaline, O., & Sari, A. K. (2022). Implemen tasi Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL) Sebagai Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Seminar of Social Sciences Engineering & Humaniora, 567.

Pangerti Ningtyas, A. Y., & Priandhini, L. (2022). Peran Notaris Dan Ppat Dalam Mengoptimalkan Penyelenggaraan Rumah Susun Di Indonesia. Pakuan Law Review, 8(1), 120–135. https://doi.org/10.33751/palar.v8i1.4592

Pintoko, P. B. F. (2021). Pertanggungjawaban Notaris/PPAT Sebagai Intelectual Dader Dibidang Perpajakandalam Melaksanakan Tugas Jabatan. Jurnal Education and Development Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan, 9(4), 148–152. http://journal.ipts.ac.id/index.php/ED/article/download/3075/2000

Prasetio, D. E. (2024). Perlindungan Dan Pengakuan Hak Ulayat Masyarakat Adat Biak Papua. Realism: Law Review, 2(1), 54–82.

Prasetio, D. E., Disantara, F. P., Azzahra, N. H., & Perwitasari, D. (2021). Strategi Pluralisme Hukum Peradilan Adat Sendi dalam Era Modernisasi Hukum. Rechtsidee, 8(1), 9.

Putri, N. M., & Marlyna, H. (2021). Pelanggaran Jabatan dan Perbuatan Melawan Hukum yang Dilakukan oleh Notaris dalam Menjalankan Kewenangannya. Acta Diurnal: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenaotariatan, 5(1), 63–77.

Rahmawati, N. (2022). Pendaftaran Tanah Berbasis Desa Lengkap. Tunas Agraria, 5(2), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.31292/jta.v5i2.177

Ramadhani, R. (2021). Pendaftaran Tanah Sebagai Langkah Untuk Mendapatkan Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Hak Atas Tanah. Jurnal Sosial Dan Ekonomi, 2(1), 31–40. http;//jurnal.bundamediagroup.co.id/index.php/sosek

Rani, J. K. P. dan M. (2021). Harmonisasi Regulasi Pembatasan Luas Tanah Pertanian Bagi Petani Dalam Program Land Reform. Jurnal de Jure, 13(56), 39–58.

Rohim, A. (2022). Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Waris Kepada Ahli Waris Saat Akan Dilakukan Jual Beli. Justness : Jurnal Hukum Politik Dan Agama, 2(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.61974/justness.v2i2.31

Rosmidah, R., & Pebrianto, D. Y. (2020). Transparency Principle on Land Acquisition for Agrarian Justice. Jambe Law Journal, 3(1), 83–101. https://doi.org/10.22437/jlj.3.1.83-101

Sagoni, S., Rahmi, & Hijrah, S. (2023). Efektivitas Hukum Terhadap Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tanah di Kelurahan Cina, Kecamatan Pammana, Kabupaten Wajo. Legal Journal of Law, 2(11), 79–90.

Santoso, U. (2017). Hukum Agraria: Kajian Komprehensif (6th ed.). Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sintya, M. (2024). Proses Peralihan Hak Atas Tanah Melalui Hibah di Notaris dan PPAT Dr. Mahmud, S.H.,M.Kn. Bevinding, 1(10), 12–22.

Suhadi, S., & Niravita, A. (2024). Urban agrarian reform: opportunities and challenges for land rights among low-income communities. Legality : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 32(2), 348–373. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v32i2.35842

Sulaiman, K. F. (2021). Polemik Fungsi Sosial Tanah dan Hak Menguasai Negara Pasca UU Nomor 12 Tahun 2012 dan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 50/PUU-X/2012. Jurnal Konstitusi, 18(1), 091. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1815

Surata, I. G., Mariadi, N. N., & Sena, I. G. A. W. (2020). The role of landreform in agrarian law politics in Indonesia. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(8), 972–976. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.08.204

Susilowati, E. (2021). Penyelesaian Kasus Tanah Dengan Dengan Surat Tanah Lebih Dari Satu ( Sertifikat Ganda) Di Kota Palangka Raya. Anterior Jurnal, 20(2), 76–83. https://doi.org/10.33084/anterior.v20i2.1778

Syofyan Hadi, T. M. (2022). Hans Kelsen’s thoughts about the law and its relevance to current legal developments. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 38(1), 220–225. https://techniumscience.com/index.php/socialsciences/article/view/332/124

Tilman, A., Mujiburohman, D. A., & Dewi, A. R. (2021). Legalisasi Tanah Kasultanan dan Tanah Kadipaten Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Riau Law Journal, 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v5i1.7852

Trivisonno, A. T. G. (2021). On the continuity of the doctrine of the basic norm in Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law. Jurisprudence, 12(3), 321–346.

Wirawan, V., Yusriyadi, Silviana, A., & Widowaty, Y. (2022). Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Sistem Pendaftaran Tanah Sebagai Upaya Pencegahan Mafia Tanah. Jurnal Negara Hukum, 13(2), 185-207.

Downloads

Published

2025-02-27