Emotional Manipulation and Public Opinion Formation through Viral Content: A Case Study of the #KaburSajaDulu Hashtag on Social Media Platform X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6318Keywords:
Persuasive Communication, Viral Hashtag, Public Opinion, Emotional Manipulation, Social MediaAbstract
This study aims to analyze how the viral hashtag #KaburAjaDulu on social media platform X is used as a persuasive communication tool in shaping public opinion through emotional manipulation. Using a descriptive qualitative approach and content and framing analysis methods, this research explores tweets containing the hashtag, focusing on language usage, emotional expression, and public responses. The findings reveal that this hashtag employs emotional communication strategies such as anger toward government policies, fear of an uncertain future, and excitement about better opportunities abroad. These strategies effectively accelerate message dissemination, shape a collective narrative of migration as a solution, and emotionally engage the audience. Additionally, the hashtagged content raises ethical concerns, including the potential for opinion manipulation and social polarization in digital spaces. In conclusion, the hashtag #KaburAjaDulu is not merely a spontaneous trend but a form of strategic communication that powerfully frames public discontent, underscoring the importance of digital literacy and ethical awareness in using social media as a platform for shaping public opinion.
Downloads
References
Alkatiri, A. B. M., Nadiah, Z., & Nasution, A. N. S. (2022). Opini publik terhadap penerapan new normal di media sosial Twitter. CoverAge: Journal of Strategic Communication, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.35814/coverage.v11i1.1728
Akurat. (2025, Februari 6). Tagar #KaburAjaDulu trending di media sosial, begini kata Kemlu RI. Akurat. https://www.akurat.co/viral/1305646438/tagar-kaburajadulu-trending-di-media-sosial-begini-kata-kemlu-ri
Aspen Institute. (n.d.). Disinformation and the role of social media influencers in times of conflict. https://www.aspeninstitute.de/digital-program/digitalization-and-democracy/disinformation-and-the-role-of-influencers-in-times-of-conflict/
Bartsch, A., Appel, M., & Storch, D. (2022). The experience of emotional shifts in narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 72(6), 1045–1066. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac030
Berger, J. (2011). Arousal increases social transmission of information. Psychological Science, 22(1), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610390024
Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
Cinelli, M., Quattrociocchi, W., Galeazzi, A., Valensise, C. M., Brugnoli, E., Schmidt, A. L., ... & Scala, A. (2021). The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
Fraser, N. (2020). Care and affective relations: Social justice and sociology. Sociology, 54(5), 1002–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120952744
Gearhart, S., & Zhang, W. (2015). “Was it something I said?” “No, it was something you posted!” A study of the spiral of silence theory in social media contexts. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(4), 208–213. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.0443
Ghanem, B., Rosso, P., & Rangel, F. (2019). An emotional analysis of false information in social media and news articles. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/1908.09951
Hasell, A., & Weeks, B. E. (2016). Emotionalized social media environments: How alternative news sources amplify emotional responses to political messages. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1044–1067. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12279
Hosseini, A. S., & Staab, S. (2023). Emotional framing in the spreading of false and true claims. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.16733
Jiang, Y., & Wei, R. (2020). The role of brand message appeals on social media in shaping consumer responses. Journal of Business Research, 116, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.11.015
Kompas. (2025, Februari 6). Ada apa di balik seruan tagar #KaburAjaDulu. Kompas. https://www.kompas.id/artikel/ada-apa-di-balik-seruan-tagar-kaburajadulu
Kontan. (2025, Februari 6). #KaburAjaDulu trending di media sosial, ini tanggapan Kemlu RI. Kontan. https://www.kontan.co.id/news/kaburajadulu-trending-di-media-sosial-ini-tanggapan-kemlu-ri
Kurniawan Pontoh, A. (2021). Computational propaganda in hashtag activism. Jurnal Komunikasi, 13(2), 123–135. https://journal.untar.ac.id/index.php/komunikasi/article/view/11086
Liu, Y., Wei, X., Zhang, Z., & Tan, J. (2019). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(8), 2931–2936. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
Ma, N., Yu, G., Jin, X., & Zhu, X. (2023). Quantified multidimensional public sentiment characteristics on social media for public opinion management: Evidence from the COVID-19 pandemic. Frontiers in Public Health, 11, 1097796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1097796
Nababan, A. M., Namotemo, D. D., & Ferdinandus, D. (2024). Peran media sosial TikTok dalam membentuk opini publik tentang calon presiden pada Pemilu 2024. ULIL ALBAB: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 3(6), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.56799/jim.v3i6.3374
Nurlina, L. M., & Purwanti, P. (2024). Dampak viralitas kasus Agus air keras terhadap opini publik di media sosial. Triwikrama: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 6(6), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.6578/triwikrama.v6i6.9424
Pew Research Center. (2024). Americans' experiences with social media news influencers. https://www.pewresearch.org/journalism/2024/11/18/americans-experiences-with-social-media-news-influencers/
Ramadhani, A. (2021). Jaringan tagar VOS: Studi kasus data percakapan media sosial tentang Covid-19 di Indonesia. Institutional Repository UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta. Retrieved from https://repository.uinjkt.ac.id/dspace/handle/123456789/56318
Rashid, R., Melton, J., Ghorbani, O., Krishnan, S., Reid, S., & Terejanu, G. (2024). Quantifying influencer impact on affective polarization. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.15893
Susilowati, L., & Sukmono, F. G. (2021). Digital movement of opinion terhadap hastag #KesehatanMental di Twitter selama pandemi Covid-19. Komuniti: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Teknologi Informasi, 13(2), 123–135. https://journals.ums.ac.id/index.php/komuniti/article/view/16196
Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: The role of big data in the manipulation of public opinion. Journal of Information Ethics, 24(2), 78–94. https://doi.org/10.3138/jie.24.2.78
Tripalupi, M. F., Aini, H. N., & Ayodya, B. P. (2023). Kajian resistensi sosial pengguna media sosial X dalam tagar #Netizenselalubenar melalui analisis jaringan komunikasi. Komunikatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Komunikasi, 13(2), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.33508/jk.v13i2.5811
UNIKOM. (2024). Peran media sosial dalam membentuk opini publik. Retrieved from https://web.unikom.ac.id/peran-media-sosial-dalam-membentuk-opini-publik/
Yu, Y., Huang, S., Liu, Y., & Tan, Y. (2020). Emotions in online content diffusion. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2011.09003
Zhao, N., Wang, Y., & Zhang, M. (2021). How does perceived social support affect online opinion expression? A moderated mediation model. Computers in Human Behavior, 114, 106548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106548
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ira Lusiawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
