Tax Court in Indonesia: System and Principles of Rechmatigheid and Doelmatigheid Testing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.6474Keywords:
Tax Court, Rechmatigheid, DoelmatigheidAbstract
The Tax Court is defined as a judicial institution with legal authority as per Law Number 14 of 2002. However, upon closer examination, there are two judicial systems in various legal countries: the unity of jurisdiction, which is adopted by rule of law countries, where only one set of courts exists without recognizing the existence of administrative courts (including tax courts), and the duality of jurisdiction, which recognizes the existence of administrative and state administrative courts. These two systems not only differ in the organizational structure of the courts but also in legal substance and procedural law. In Indonesia, research shows that the judicial system is unique. When viewed from the perspective of the court's organizational structure, it is closer to the unity of jurisdiction system, but in terms of court principles or dispute resolution procedures, it aligns more with the duality of jurisdiction system. Therefore, the author concludes that Indonesia's judicial system is a mixed system.
Downloads
References
Ahmadi, W. (2006). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Wajib Pajak Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Pajak. Bandung: Refika Aditama.
Asmara, G., & Soerodjo, I. (2006). Peradilan pajak & lembaga penyanderaan (gijzeling) dalam hukum pajak di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Pressindo.
Bohari, U. (2001). Bahari U, Pengantar Hukum Pajak, Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001, hlm. 165. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Brotodihardjo, R. S. (2003). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Pajak (Cet.1 Ed.4). Bandung : Refika Aditama.
Calmes-Brunet, S. (2016). The principle of effective legal protection in French administrative law. In The Principle of Effective Legal Protection in Administrative Law (pp. 105–121). Routledge.
Candra, I. G. A. A. D., Kartika, I. G. A. P., & Bagiastra, I. N. (2024). Constitutional Supremacy in Legal States in Indonesia. Policy, Law, Notary And Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 3(2), 260–272. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i2.1134
Cruz, P. de. (2012). Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Common Law, Civil Law dan Sosialits Law (Cetakan I). Bandung : Nusa Media.
Dani, U. (2018). Memahami Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Sistem Unity Of Jurisdiction Atau Duality Of Jurisdiction? Sebuah Studi Tentang Struktur Dan Karakteristiknya. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(3), 405–424. https://doi.org/10.25216/JHP.7.3.2018.405-424
Frydman, M. P. (2008). 11th Annual AIJA Tribunals Conference. Association with the Council of Australian Tribunals, 5–6.
Lotulung, P. E. (2013). Hukum Tata Usaha Negara dan Kekuasaan. Jakarta : Salemba Humanika.
Marzuki, P. M. (2014). Penelitian Hukum (Cetakan Ke-9 (ed.); Edisi Revi). Jakarta, Prenadamedia Group.
Muslimin, A. (1985). Beberapa Asas dan Pengertian Pokok Tentang Administrasi dan Hukum Administrasi. Pb. Alumni.
Mustafa, B. (1979). Pokok-pokok Hukum Administrasi Negara. Bandung: Alumni.
Nurhadi. (2014). Pengantar Studi Hukum Konstitusi (Cetakan IV). Bandung: Nusamedia.
Pound, R. (1957). The development of constitutional guarantees of liberty. In (No Title). New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Seerden, R., & Stroink, F. A. M. (2002). Administrative law of the European Union, its member states and the United States: a comparative analysis (Vol. 39). Intersentia nv.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Adib Brilian Muhammad*, Mastur, Arum Widiastuti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
