Resolution of Judge's Ethical Violations by the Judicial Honorary Council in the Perspective of the Joint Regulation of the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.6642Keywords:
Judicial Honorary Council, Judicial Commission, Judicial Ethics, Supervision, Indonesia, Code of EthicsAbstract
This paper examines the role of the Judicial Honorary Council (MKH) in supervising judges' ethics in Indonesia, within the framework of the joint regulation between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court. The establishment of the Judicial Commission in 1999 marked a crucial step in addressing the need for independent external supervision of the judiciary, aimed at ensuring a transparent, fair, and professional judicial system. The paper highlights the significant role of the Judicial Commission in monitoring judges' behavior, proposing the appointment of judges, and enforcing the Code of Ethics and Judicial Conduct Guidelines. However, despite its mandate, the Judicial Commission’s recommendations often face non-compliance from the Supreme Court, particularly regarding technical judicial violations. The Judicial Honorary Council, as part of the Supreme Court's internal supervisory mechanism, plays a pivotal role in processing violations committed by judges. This research identifies the challenges faced by MKH in enforcing the code of ethics, such as indecisiveness, potential conflicts of interest, and inadequate follow-up on recommendations. These challenges undermine the effectiveness of the supervision system, highlighting the need for improved coordination and clearer delineation of authority between the Judicial Commission and the Supreme Court. The paper also emphasizes the importance of strengthening the collaboration between these two institutions to ensure a consistent and effective judicial supervision system. Through an in-depth legal analysis, the study concludes that enhancing transparency, accountability, and objectivity in the supervision process is essential for fostering public trust in the Indonesian judicial system.
Downloads
References
Ibrahim, J. (2006). Teori dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Bayumedia.
Illiyina, U. (2016). Pasang Surut Komisi Yudisial: Kreasi, resistensi dan restorasi. Jurnal Konstitusi, 8(3), 391. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk837
Ishak, V. S. (2016). Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Hakim Dalam Pengawasan Perilaku Hakim. Lex et Societatis, IV(7), 171–179.
Kalalo, D. M. (2014). Eksistensi Komisi Yudisial Terhadap Pelaksanaan Kode Etik Profesi Hakim. Jurnal Lex Crimen, 3(1).
Muhammad, A. (2004). Hukum dan Penelitian Hukum. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Mulkan, H., Okprianti, R., Aprita, S., & Pratama, F. R. (2023). Violation of Ethics by Public Officials in Relation to Corruption Cases. Policy Law Notary and Regulatory Issues (POLRI), 3(1), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.55047/polri.v3i1.896
Permana, T. C. I. (2014). Eksistensi Dan Peran Komisi Yudisial : Pengkajian Konteks Filosofi, Sejarah Dan Tujuan Pembentukannya Dalam Dinamika Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 3(1), 85–100.
Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik indonesia. (2010). Cetak Biru Pembaruan Komisi Yudisial 2010-2025. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia. (2016). Optimalisasi Wewenang Komisi Yudisial dalam Mewujudkan Hakim Berintegritas. Sekretariat Jenderal Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Siahaan, R. L. A., Monas, Aeprilya, S., & Hasanah, D. U. (2024). Fungsi Pemeriksaan Dan Pengawasan Praktik Pmkh Pada HakimMelalui Majelis Kehormatan Hakim Dan Komisi Yudisial. Kultura Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora, 2(10), 271–281.
Suparto, S. (2018). Kedudukan Dan Kewenangan Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia Dan Perbandingannya Dengan Komisi Yudisial Di Beberapa Negara Eropa. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 47(4), 497. https://doi.org/10.21143/.vol47.no4.1585
Sutiyoso, B. (2011). Penguatan Peran Komisi Yudisial Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 18(2), 266–284. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol18.iss2.art7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 M. Martindo Merta, Febrian, Iza Rumestan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















