Paradigm Changes in Proving Unlawful Acts in Corruption Crimes Following Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.6648Keywords:
Constitutional Court Decision, State Financial Losses, Evidence, Corruption CrimesAbstract
The Constitutional Court Decision Number 25/PUU-XIV/2016 has marked an important turning point in the enforcement of corruption law in Indonesia, especially in proving the element of state financial loss. Before this decision, the formal approach that emphasized procedural violations without the need to prove actual losses was still commonly used. However, after the decision, the legal interpretation shifted towards a material approach that required actual loss to prove corruption. This change has quite complex legal and practical consequences, ranging from increasing the burden of proof for public prosecutors, and dependence on the results of audits of state financial institutions to technical challenges in coordination between law enforcers. This study comprehensively examines the development of legal interpretation before and after the Constitutional Court decision, and its impact on the evidentiary process, and formulates strategic steps that can be taken to strengthen the effectiveness of corruption eradication while ensuring legal certainty for the parties.
Downloads
References
Adityo, I. &. (2024). Reformasi Hukum dan Pembuktian Kasus Korupsi Gratifikasi di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Deepublish.
Akbar, A. W. (2023). Kepastian Hukum Praperadilan Penetapan Tersangka dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Studi Interdisipliner Perspektif, 23(1), 122.
BJ, A. M. (2020). Pemberantasan Korupsi: Fungsi Dan Kewenangan Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Guna Mengembalikan Kerugian Keuangan Negara Di Indonesia. Bandung: Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Chazawi, A. (2018). Hukum Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Faturachman, F. A. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban dan Penegakan Hukum Pidana Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 4(2), 197–212.
Fikri, H. (2022). Implementasi Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Tindak Pidana Korupsi Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 7(2), 194-209.
Gunawan, I. &. (2024). Penyebab Tingginya Kasus Korupsi Dana Desa Dalam Sudut Pandang Teori Struktural Fungsional Talcot Parson (Study Literatur). Journal Of Human And Education (JAHE), 4(4), 609-618.
Hartanti, E. (2023). Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Hatta, M. S. (2022). Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Materi Pengantar. Banjar Masin: PT. BDProject.
Hosnah, A. U. (2021). Karakteristik lmu Hukum dan Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Depok: Rajawali Pers.
Jawa, D. M. (2024). Tantangan Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 7(2), 1006-1017.
Julpandi, H. (2024). Kedudukan Hukum Whistle-BlowerDalam Penanggulangan TindakPidana Korupsi di Indonesia. CENDEKIA: Jurnal Hukum, Sosial & Humaniora, 2(2), 487-507.
Kristiana, Y. (2017). Independensi Kejaksaan dalam Penyidikan Korupsi. Jakarta: Citra Aditya.
Mahmud, A. (2021). Pengembalian Aset Tindak Pidana Korupsi: Pendekatan Hukum Progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Megawati, M. R. (2024). Implementasi Fungsi Kepolisian Selaku Penyidik Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP), 5(2), 570-588.
Muthoifin, Erawati, D., Nashihin, H., Mahmudulhassan, Setiawan, B. A., Rofi, S., & Hafidz. (2024). An Interfaith Perspective on Multicultural Education for Sustainable Development Goals (SDGS). Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 4(3), e01720. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v4.n03.pe01720
Nashihin, H., Rachman, Y. A., Fitrianto, I., & Suhartono. (2025). Empowering Creativity Of Disabled Students Through Sustainable Agropreneur Education at Ainul Yakin Islamic Boarding School in Yogyakarta to Support the SDGs. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(2), e02878. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n02.pe02878
Saputra, R. (2015). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jurnal CitaHukum, II(2).
Saputro, D. (2024). Kedudukan Praperadilan dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidika, 10(6), 121.
Setiyawan, W. B. (2024). Hukum Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Sada Kurnia Pustaka.
Setiyono. (2024). Problematika Penetapan Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama pada Perkara Korupsi Ditinjau dari Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Lex Jumadica, 21(1), 123.
Supriyadi. (2019). Perlindungan Hukum Whistleblower Dalam Upaya Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Law Review, 53(9), 89–99.
Syaiful Anam, H. N. (2023). Metode Penelitian (Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, Eksperimen, dan R&D). PT GLOBAL EKSEKUTIF TEKNOLOGI. https://books.google.co.id/books?hl=id&lr=&id=w-bFEAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA1&ots=vRP1bKcVRG&sig=dA4E7fb8uf45B7Uv87JkztTGviQ&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Ulfa, H., Kurniandini, S., & Ihsan, A. M. (2023). The Enforcement of Marriage Law ( No 16 of 2019 ) Through The Ambassadors of Child Marriage Prevention in Tembarak District , Temanggung Regency I . Introduction. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 22(1), 309–325.
Yurizal. (2017). Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia. Malang: Media Nusa Creative.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdullah Sulaiman, Dedy Cahyadi, Iwansyah, Rahmad Prasetyo, Pambudi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
