Strengthening Alternative Law for Business Dispute Resolution between StateOwned Enterprises and Peace-Oriented Private Enterprises (Benefit-Benefit Solution)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.6983Keywords:
Alternative Dispute Resolution, Business Disputes, State-Owned Enterprises, Private Enterprises, SettlementAbstract
The settlement of business disputes in the current State- Owned Enterprises Law accommodates Alternative Dispute Resolution through consensus. However, the ADR regulation only governs disputes between state- owned enterprises and private enterprises. In fact, ADR as a nonlitigation instrument is very suitable and popularly used by business companies at the global and national levels with the principle of beneficial solutions. The absence of ADR provisions for dispute resolution between SOEs and private companies is an issue that has been raised with the following objectives: 1. To analyse the applicable legal provisions on alternative dispute resolution in handling business disputes between SOEs and private companies; 2. Strengthen
alternative dispute resolution laws in resolving business disputes between SOEs and private companies with a focus on mutual benefit for the disputing parties (benefit-benefit solution). The results of the study show that: 1. APS regulations are found in different laws and regulations governing various business sectors, but they are not fully and specifically regulated in the State-Owned Enterprise Law, Limited Liability Company Law, Arbitration Law, and the APS itself. 2. Legal reinforcement is needed to regulate ADR in the SOE Law, the PT Law and the establishment of a special ADR Law in order to create peace-oriented ADR that is beneficial to disputing SOEs and BUMS.
Downloads
References
Adolf, H. (2015). Dasar-dasar, Prinsip dan Filosofi Arbitrase (2nd ed.). Keni Media.
Afriyadi, A. D. (2020). Erick Minta Anak Buahnya Bereskan Saling Tuntut BUMN dalam 100 Hari. DetikFinance.
Ali, A., & Haryani, W. (2014). Sosiologi hukum: kajian empiris terhadap pengadilan. Kencana.
Arsal, F. R. (2024). The role of international arbitration institutions in resolving business disputes between
countries. Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice, 1(4), 11.
Asyhadie, Z. (2011). Hukum Bisnis Prinsip dan Pelaksanaannya di Indonesia (5th ed.). Rajawali Pers.
Atmadjaja, D. I. (2012). Hukum Dagang IndonesiaSejarah, Pengertiandan Prinsip - prinsip Hukum Dagang. Setara
Press.
Husni, M. (2008). Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Luar Pengadilan. Journal
Equality, 13(1).
Irianto, S. (2009). Metode Peneltian Hukum: Konstelasi dan Refleksi. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Kartasasmita, G. (1996). Pembangunan untuk rakyat: memadukan pertumbuhan dan pemerataan. Cides.
Margono, S. (2004). ADR (Alternative Dispute Resolutian) dan Arbitrase Proses Pelembagaan dan Aspek Hukum.
Ghalia Indonesia.
Mohune, R. S. (2013). Praktik Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Bidang Kontrak Bisnis Perusahaan. Lex Privatum,
1(1), 104.
Natamiharja, R. (2022). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional (2nd ed.). Pusaka Media.
Priyatna Abdurrasyid. (2011). Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa (APS) (2nd ed.). Fikahati Aneska.
Rustan, R. (2013). MediasiSebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Hukum Mediation AsLegal Conflict Settlement
Alternative. Universitas Hasanuddin.
Sembiring, J. J. (2011). Cara menyelesaikan sengketa di luar Pengadilan. Visimedia.
Sukmawijaya, A. (2020). Erick Thohir Ungkap Ada 17 BUMN Ribut dan Berujung di Pengadilan. Kumparan.
Widjaja, G. (2005). Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa.
Widjaja, G., & Yani, A. (2000). Seri Hukum Bisnis: Hukum Arbitrase. Jakarta Penerbit PT. Raja Grafindo
Persada, 93.
Winarta, F. H. (2013). Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan Internasional (2nd ed.).
Sinar Grafika.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bambang Hariyanto, Annalisa Yahanan, Muhammad Syaifuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
