Normative Analysis of Murder Case Decisions in Surabaya: Case Study Number 454/Pid.B/2024/PN

Authors

  • Rio Armanda Agustian Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Bangka Belitung, Indonesia
  • Valentina Moiso Assistant Professor in Sociology, Dept. of Cultures, Politics and Society - University of Turin, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i1.7293

Keywords:

criminal law, murder, court decisions, defendants' rights, justice

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the application of criminal law in murder cases with a focus on the decision of case Number 454/Pid.B/2024/PN in Surabaya. This case involves the application of Articles 338 and 340 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) related to unplanned murder and premeditated murder. This study uses normative legal research methods with a legislative approach and a case approach. The results of the study show that the judge has carefully considered the existing evidence and sentenced in accordance with the applicable legal provisions. Although the defendant claimed self-defense, the judge considered that there was not enough evidence to support the claim. The impact of the verdict on the perpetrator provides a deterrent effect and serves as a warning to the public about the severe legal consequences for the crime of murder. Meanwhile, although the victim's family is satisfied with the court's decision, they still feel a loss that cannot be replaced by any punishment. This study concludes that even though the judicial process has been carried out in accordance with the applicable procedures, there is still room for improvement in terms of the time given to the defense and attention to the psychological condition of the perpetrator

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Valentina Moiso, Assistant Professor in Sociology, Dept. of Cultures, Politics and Society - University of Turin, Italy

Assistant Professor in Sociology, Dept. of Cultures, Politics and Society - University of Turin, Italy

References

Anwar, R., Faisal, F., & Agustin, R. A. (2021). PERSPECTIVE OF RELIGIOUS JUSTICE IN THE FORMULATION OF PENAL REFORM. Cepalo, 5(1), 53–64. Https://Doi.Org/10.25041/Cepalo.V5no1.2240

Asnawi, A., & Mulyana, A. (2018). PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA POLITIK UANG PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH DI PROVINSI BANTEN MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 10 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PEMILIHAN GUBERNUR, BUPATI DAN WALIKOTA. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 4(2), 138. Https://Doi.Org/10.35194/Jhmj.V4i2.467

Dedi Romadhan, Anak Agung Sagung Laksmi Dewi, & I Made Minggu Widyantara. (2021). Analisis Putusan Hakim Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Putusan Nomor 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN.Dps). Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 2(1), 25–30. Https://Doi.Org/10.22225/Juinhum.2.1.3079.25-30

Efendi, J., & Rijadi, P. (2022). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris. Prenada Media.

Emaliawati, E., Saragih, B., & Mulyana, A. (2022). Effectiveness Of Social Work Sanction As A Substitute For Imprisonment In The Perspective Of Sentencing Purposes. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(3), 325. Https://Doi.Org/10.30641/Dejure.2022.V22.325-336

Fernando, Y. F., Hum, M., Pidana, T., Hakim, P., & Pidana, P. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Hakim Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Terhadap Nyawa Seseorang ( Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor : 454 / Pid . B / 2024 / PN Sby ). Legal Jounal Of Law Advice, 2(3), 1–11.

Feronica, Putri, A. S., & Honggare, E. H. (2022). Are There Legal Consequences From Procedural Mistakes In Handling Child Sexual Abuse Victims In Indonesia? International Journal Of Research In Business And Social Science (2147- 4478), 11(1), 263–272. Https://Doi.Org/10.20525/Ijrbs.V11i1.1598

Firmansyah, D. B. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pencurian Dengan Pemberatan ( Studi Putusan Nomor 1666 / Pid . B / 2024 / PN Sby ). JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan), 8(3), 3081–3086.

Gumilar, B. W., Gunarto, G., & Khisni, A. (2020). Reconstruction Of Life Imprisonment In Prison System In Indonesia. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 2(4), 499. Https://Doi.Org/10.30659/Jdh.V2i4.8348

Hasibuan, N., Panjaitan, B. S., & Sativa, A. (2023). Tinjauan Yuridis Pelepasan Terdakwa Dari Segala Tuntutan Hukum Dalam Kasus Tindak Pidana Penipuan Menurut Perspedktif Hukum Positif Dan Hukum Islam: As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 5(3), 665–680. Https://Doi.Org/10.47467/As.V5i3.3403

Hukum, S., Putri, A. A., & Firdaus, M. L. (2025). Ambiguitas Hak Asasi Manusia Terhadap Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Lama Dan Baru. Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM, 3(3), 150–160. Https://Doi.Org/10.58812/Shh.V3.I03

Irawan, R., Isnaini, A. M., & Rifai, A. (2022). Analisis Perkawinan Beda Agama Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Hukum Di Indonesia (Studi Putusan No:916/ Pdt.P/2022/PN.Surabaya). Unizar Recht Journal, 1(4), 430–440.

Kaemirawati, D. T., Hidayah, B., Krisnadwipayana, U., Hakim, I., Publik, K., & Hukum, S. (2025). Pengaruh Vonis Bebas Ronald Tannur Dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum Terhadap Kepercayaan Publik. Binamulia Hukum, 14(1). Https://Doi.Org/10.37893/Jbh.V14i1.941

Marthin, S., Borman, S., & Handayat, N. (2025). Analisa Yuridis Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana Berdasarkan Putusan Pengadilan No. 196/.PID.B/2023/Pn. TNN. COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum, 5(02), 1–23.

Muhammad, D. A. N., Di, R., Barama, M., & Rorie, R. E. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Kasus Perkosaan Dan Pembunuhan Berencana Dalam Putusan Pengadilan Atas Korban Vina Dewi Dan Muhammad Rizky Di Cirebon (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 3/Pid.B/2017/PN Cbn) 1. Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Unsrat, 14(5).

Nasera, F. A., Zahra, Y. I., & Adzaningjagat, G. (2025). Kajian Yuridis Putusan Nomor 454 / Pid . B / 2024 / PN . Sby Tentang Bebasnya Terdakwa Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian Berdasarkan Teori Kepastian Hukum Dan Kode Etik Kehakiman. Amnesti: Jurnal Hukum, 7(1), 33–50.

Prasetyawardani, A. S., & Isnawati, M. (2021). Pembunuhan Oleh Anak Karena Pembelaan Terpaksa. Borobudur Law Review, 3(2), 123–135.

Pritchard, A. J., Reckdenwald, A., Nordham, C., & Holton, J. (2018). Improving Identification Of Strangulation Injuries In Domestic Violence: Pilot Data From A Researcher–Practitioner Collaboration. Feminist Criminology, 13(2), 160–181. Https://Doi.Org/10.1177/1557085116653181

Putra, T. K., & Soediro. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Jurnalis Dalam Mewujudkan Independensi Pers Di Indonesia. Journal Presumption Of Law, 7(April), 48–58.

Putri, B. S. D. (2025). Analisis Vonis Bebas Terhadap Terdakwa Pembunuhan Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Substantif ( Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 454/Pid.B/2024/PN Sby). Journal Evidence Of Law, 4(1), 316–328.

Rachmad, F. (2021). PENGATURAN RESTORATIF JUSTICE TINDAK PIDANA VANDALISME. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 9.

Rafika, C., Mulyadi, L. M., & Leviza, J. (2025). Analisis Kualifikasi Unsur Berencana Dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 907/Pid.B/2020/Pn Mdn). Journal Of Science And Social Research, 4307(1), 306–313.

Rahmat, D. (2025). Peran Hakim Pada Proses Penemuan Hukum Sebagai Upaya Penegakan Keadilan Berdasarkan Kode Etik Hakim. Journal Evidence Of Law, 4(1), 207–230.

Risaputra, J. S., & Gregorius, J. B. (2022). Peranan Advokat Terkait Implementasi Restorative Justice Dalam Praktik Peradilan Pidana Di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Staatrechts, 5(2), 1–15.

Saleh, G. S., & Saleh, G. S. (2022). Juridical Analysis Of The Crime Of Online Store Fraud In Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 11(1), 151. Https://Doi.Org/10.25216/Jhp.11.1.2022.151-175

Sari, M. P., & Harefa, S. (2023). Tinjauan Unsur Pembunuhan Berencana (Moord) Dalam Tindak Pidana Analisis Putusan 1474/Pid.B/2019/PN Dps. Sanskara Hukum Dan HAM, 2(01), 1–10. Https://Doi.Org/10.58812/Shh.V2i01.169

Sihaloho, T. M. B., Sitompul, R., & Isnainul, O. (2019). Analisis Yuridis Tindak Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penyalahgunaan Bahan Bakar Minyak Dan Gas Bumi Bersubsidi. Unes Journal Of Swara Justisia, 9(1), 41.

Syafithri, A. A., & Mahardhika, V. (2024). Analisis Putusan Pengadilan Militer Iii-12 Surabaya Nomor 186- K/Pm.Iii-12/Au/Xii/2021 Tentang Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Terkait Pemberian Rehabilitasi Bagi Pengguna Narkotika. Novum : Jurnal Hukum, 2(4), 22–34.

Tatang. (2024). Analisis Penerapan Hukum Terhadap Tindak Pidana Dalam Perspektif Keadilan Restoratif Di Indonesia. Jurnal Inovasi Global, 2(3), 543–551.

Tumanggor, F., Muazzul, M., & Zulyadi, R. (2019). Handling Of Narcotics Child Victims In Child Special Coaching Institutions Class I Tanjung Gusta, Medan. Budapest International Research And Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal) : Humanities And Social Sciences, 2(4), 50–55. Https://Doi.Org/10.33258/Birci.V2i4.564

Wahyuningsih, S. E. (2016). PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP ANAK SEBAGAI KORBAN TINDAK PIDANA KESUSILAAN DALAM HUKUM PIDANA POSITIF SAAT INI. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 3(2), 172. Https://Doi.Org/10.26532/Jph.V3i2.1407

Wicaksono, R. A., & Kusriyah, S. K. (2018). Implementation Of Restorative Justice Approach In Legal Protection Against Lightweight Crime By The Children. Jurnal Daulat Hukum, 1(4), 943. Https://Doi.Org/10.30659/Jdh.V1i4.4136

Widodo, Karina Luana Pramesti, & Faridah, H. (2021). Analisis Kasus Begal Sepeda Motor Di Kota Kendari ( Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor.308/Pid.B/2021/Pn Kdi). Jurmal Panorama Hukum, 6(2), 126–138.

Wiratama, G. H., Priyambodo, M. A., & Wijayanthi, F. R. (2023). TELAAH PASAL 338 -340 KUHP TENTANG PEMBUNUHAN BERENCANA (Analisis Pembunuhan Berencana Mahasiswa Universitas Surabaya Yang Di Masukkan Koper Lalu Dibuang Oleh Guru Les Musik). Jurnal Multidisiplin Dehasen (MUDE), 2(3), 661–672. Https://Doi.Org/10.37676/Mude.V2i3.4725

Downloads

Published

2025-06-20