Age Requirement and Legal Certainty in Indonesia’s Presidential Candidacy after Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v24i2.7423Keywords:
Minimum Age Limit, Presidential Candidates, Constitutional Court, Legal Certainty, Constitutional, DemocracyAbstract
This study examines the implementation of Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning General Elections, focusing on the minimum age requirement for presidential and vice-presidential candidates in Indonesia. The issue became significant after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which reinterpreted Article 169(q) to allow candidates under 40 years old to run if they currently hold or have held an elected public office. The research aims to analyze the legal certainty of this age limitation and its conformity with the principles of justice and equality enshrined in the 1945 Constitution. Using a normative juridical method, this study reviews relevant statutory provisions, legal doctrines, and academic commentaries to evaluate the consistency between the Court’s decision and constitutional values. The results reveal that the decision introduces a progressive shift in Indonesia’s constitutional jurisprudence by harmonizing formal legality with substantive justice. It ensures that legal certainty is maintained while promoting inclusiveness and equal opportunity in the democratic process. The conclusion emphasizes that the reinterpretation strengthens Indonesia’s constitutional democracy by affirming that leadership eligibility should be based on competence and public trust rather than age alone. This finding highlights the importance of integrating constitutional justice with democratic participation in future electoral law reforms.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, M. K., & Rachmawati, I. (2023). The Development of the P&I Club as a Protection for Indonesian Carrier. LITIGASI, 24(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7382
Aditya, R. B. (2023). Constitutional Limits of Presidential Age Requirements in Indonesia: A Doctrinal Analysis. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk202302
Aisha, N., & Natasha, D. (2024). Rethinking Ageism and Political Representation in Indonesian Electoral Law. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 5(1), 45–68. https://doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v5i1.35620
Alexy, R. (2022). Proportionality and Constitutional Rights in Modern Democracies. German Law Journal, 23(3), 356–379. https://doi.org/10.1017/glj.2022.25
Anwar, M., & Fauzan, R. (2021). The Dynamics of Judicial Activism in the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Hasanuddin Law Review, 7(3), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v7i3.3147
Arifin, N. A., & Sutanto, H. (2023). The Role of the Constitutional Court in Strengthening Democracy in Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 16(2), 221–240. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v16i2.682
Asshiddiqie, J. (2020). The Living Constitution and Judicial Interpretation in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Constitutional Studies, 3(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.31078/ijcs312
Bagir, M., & Siregar, A. (2022). The Principle of Equality Before the Law in Constitutional Court Decisions. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 9(2), 278–296. https://doi.org/10.23920/pjl.v9i2.509
Barak, A. (2020). Human dignity, proportionality, and judicial discretion. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 18(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa004
Baswedan, A. (2023). Transformative Constitutionalism and Democratic Participation in Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 19(1), 32–55. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev.v19i1.802
Budiman, F., & Rahman, M. (2021). Judicial Interpretation and Legal Certainty in Indonesia’s Constitutional Adjudication. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 6(1), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i1.45392
Doob, L. W. (2019). Discrimination and Power in Political Systems. Journal of Social Issues, 75(4), 981–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12389
Fauzi, A., & Nuraini, S. (2024). The Impact of Constitutional Court Decisions on Electoral Policy Reform in Indonesia. Jurnal HAM, 15(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2024.15.67-90
Firmansyah, D. (2022). Judicial Activism or Constitutional Guardianship? A Critical Review of the Indonesian Constitutional Court. Hasanuddin Law Review, 8(1), 101–120. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i1.3579
Hamzah, M. G. (2023). Legal Reasoning in Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023: A Reflection on Constitutional Justice. Jurnal Konstitusi, 20(3), 355–374. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk202303
Klare, K. (2019). Legal Culture and Transformative Constitutionalism. South African Journal on Human Rights, 35(2), 203–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2019.1668935
Lestari, R. (2023). Judicial Review and Democratic Legitimacy in Indonesia. Constitutional Review, 19(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev.v19i2.805
Mulyani, L. W., & David, D. (2023). Civil Society’s Inclusivity in Providing Access to Justice through the Witness and Victims’ Community-Based Program. LITIGASI, 24(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v24i1.7374
Rahardjo, S. (2020). The Interplay Between Legal Certainty and Justice in Constitutional Law. Yustisia Journal of Law, 9(3), 412–432. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i3.5033
Ramadhan, I., & Setyowati, P. (2022). Constitutional Court Decisions and Democratic Consolidation in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of Law and Governance, 5(2), 89–108. https://doi.org/10.21512/ijlg.v5i2.722
Samsudin, M. I. (2022). A Comparison of Judicial Review in Indonesian Constitutional Court and French Constitutional Council. Indonesian Comparative Law Review, 5(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.18196/iclr.v5i1.15127
Simanjuntak, D., & Arif, M. (2021). The Principle of Proportionality in Indonesian Constitutional Jurisprudence. Padjadjaran Journal of Law, 8(2), 257–278. https://doi.org/10.23920/pjl.v8i2.431
Siregar, F., & Hanum, D. (2023). The Role of Judicial Interpretation in Promoting Substantive Equality. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 17(1), 112–130. https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2023.17.112
Smith, T., & Gonzalez, R. (2020). Constitutional Justice and Judicial Review in Emerging Democracies. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 18(4), 1021–1043. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa056
Stone Sweet, A., & Mathews, J. (2021). Proportionality balancing and constitutional governance. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law, 59(2), 457–489. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3771234
Sofyan, H., & Widodo, T. (2021). The Doctrine of Living Constitution in Indonesian Judicial Practice. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 51(2), 189–210. https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol51.no2.2891
Suhartono, E., & Malik, A. (2024). Legal Certainty and Human Rights in Indonesian Constitutional Interpretation. Jurnal HAM, 15(2), 222–245. https://doi.org/10.30641/ham.2024.15.222-245
Tsuroyya, C., & Nurtjahyo, L. I. (2024). Perbandingan Tindak Pidana Perkosaan Antara KUHP Baru Indonesia dengan Sexual Offences Act 2003 Inggris. LITIGASI, 25(1), 143–170. https://doi.org/10.23969/litigasi.v25i1.12758
Tushnet, M. (2020). Judicial review and democratic legitimacy. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 18(2), 455–473. https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moaa028
Wibisono, H. (2023). The Constitutional Court and the Protection of Political Rights in Indonesia. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 20(2), 198–217. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v20i2.658
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Abdul Hadi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
