Living Law In The Antaran Wedding Tradition: A Study Of Customary Marriage Practices In Tanah Kampung, Sungai Penuh City, Jambi Province

Authors

  • Pidayan Sasnifa Sultan Thaha Saifuddin State Islamic University of Jambi
  • M. Kamal Fathoni Universitas Jambi
  • Ana Ramadhona Universitas Jambi
  • Mutia Dwi Arita Deli Universitas Jambi
  • Ahmad Sholihin Muttaqin Universitas Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v25i1.7885

Keywords:

Customary Marriage; Antaran; Living Law; Islamic Law.

Abstract

This article examines the dynamics of customary marriage practices within the framework of legal pluralism, highlighting the antaran tradition as practiced by a local community in Jambi. This tradition demonstrates a marked divergence from prevailing practices in Jambi society, as antaran is conducted after the wedding reception and applies only to couples originating from the same village, while grooms from outside the community are not subject to this obligation. The study employs perspectives of customary law and the concept of living law to understand how these local norms are formed, maintained, and institutionalized as social standards within the community. The analysis also situates the antaran custom within the framework of Islamic law through the concept of 'urf, to assess whether this practice meets the criteria of a tradition that can be recognized by Islamic jurisprudence. Furthermore, the research compares this phenomenon with cross-cultural and cross-community marriage practices found in other societies to identify broader patterns in the formation of social boundaries. The findings indicate that the antaran tradition functions not merely as part of the wedding ritual but also as an instrument of social cohesion, a means of preserving local identity, and a mechanism of social control that strengthens communal bonds. This study contributes to a deeper understanding of the relationships among customary law, Islamic law, and national law in contemporary Indonesian society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, M. M. (2022). An Evaluation of Pre-Modern Fiqh Rules About the Marital Practices of Non-Muslims. UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law. https://doi.org/10.5070/n419156051

Babbie, E. (2016). The Practice of Social Research (14th ed.). Cengage.

Benda-Beckmann, F. von, & Benda-Beckmann, K. von. (2023). Adat, Islam und Staat – Rechtspluralismus in Indonesien. In Unknown. https://doi.org/10.5771/9783496030904-59

Bosanquet, A. (2022). Ordered Relationships: The Regulation of Jewish-Christian Marriages and Children in Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya’s Legal Works. Entangled Religions, 13(1), 1--? https://doi.org/10.46586/er.13.2022.9938

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Charmé, S. Z. (2015). The Conflict of Authenticities in Intermarriage and Conversion. Journal of Jewish Identities, 8(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.1353/jji.2015.0009

Cotterrell, R. (2006). Law, Culture and Society. Ashgate.

Creswell, J. W. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Czimbalmos, M. (2019). Laws, doctrines and practice: a study of intermarriages and the ways they challenged the Jewish Community of Helsinki from 1930 to 1970. Nordic Journal of Religion and Society, 32(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.30752/NJ.77260

Darwis, R. (2017). Hukum Islam dalam Multikulturalis Pluralitas di Indonesia. ZJPI. https://doi.org/10.31332/ZJPI.V3I1.712

Daud, S. M., Rapik, M., & Monita, Y. (2022). Dinamika Status Hukum Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Perspektif Fikih Indonesia. Undang. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.5.2.357-391

Davis, M. (2004). Interracialism: Black-White Intermarriage in American History, Literature, and Law. American Quarterly, 56(2). https://doi.org/10.2307/27501478

Djawas, M., Nurdin, A., & Zainuddin, M. (2024). Harmonization of State, Custom, and Islamic Law in Aceh. Hasanuddin Law Review. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v10i1.4824

Ehrlich, E. (2002). Fundamental Principles of the Sociology of Law. Transaction Publishers.

Fenwick, S. (2016). Faith and Freedom in Indonesian Law. In Unknown. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657356-4

Fitri, W., Rusdiana, S., & Putri, W. R. A. (2024). Permasalahan Hukum Perkawinan Beda Agama di Indonesia: Studi Komparatif. Journal Hukum Media Justitia Nusantara, 14(1), ??? https://doi.org/10.30999/mjn.v14i1.2938

Flick, U. (2014). An Introduction to Qualitative Research (5th ed.). Sage.

Ghina Nabilah Effendi, M. Kamal Fathoni, Y. (2025). Kawin Ajum in Jambi: Socio-Legal and Islamic Law Perspectives on Cultural and Religious Heritage. Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan, 25(1), 165–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v25i1.165-189

Gordon, A. (2014). Jewish Intermarriage in American Society: Literature Review. Women in Judaism: A Multidisciplinary e-Journal, 11(2), 4. https://wjudaism.org/

Hamida, N. A. (2022). Adat Law and Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: Toward A New Perspective? Indonesian Journal of Law and Society. https://doi.org/10.19184/ijls.v3i1.26752

Hayes, C. (1999). Intermarriage and Impurity in Ancient Jewish Sources. Harvard Theological Review, 92(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0017816000017831

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications.

Luthfi, M., Fajrin, Y. A., & Bachtiar, H. (2024). The Existence of ’Urf in the Resolution of Marriage Disputes in Islamic Law: A Living Law Perspective. Jurnal IUS: Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i1.1356

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Nasir, M. A. (2022). Negotiating Muslim Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia: Integration and Conflict in Islamic Law. Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam, 21(2), 16--? https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v21i2.5436

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (8th ed.). Pearson.

Perșa, R. (2018). Intermarriage in the Canonical Tradition of the Orthodox Church. Review of Ecumenical Studies Sibiu, 10(3), 3. https://doi.org/10.2478/RESS-2018-0028

Rajafi, A., Sugitanata, A., & Lusiana, V. (2024). The Double-Faced Legal Expression. Journal of Islamic Law. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v5i1.2153

Sivan, H. S. (2001). Jewish-Christian Marital Frontiers in Late Antiquity. In The Oxford Handbook of Jewish Studies (pp. 1–20). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199240326.003.0020

Sollors, W. (2004). Interracialism: Black-White Intermarriage in American History, Literature, and Law. American Literature, 76(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3509558

Somad. (2002). Adat Melayu Jambi. Pustaka Adat.

Sona, F. (2018). Interfaith Marriages across the Mediterranean Sea: Spouses Sailing between State Law and Sharīʿah. Journal of Mediterranean Studies, 27(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00263206.2018.???

Steward, D. (2011). Living Law: Reconsidering Eugen Ehrlich. Law & Society Review, 45(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2011.00433_3.x

Suhasti, E., Djazimah, S., & Hartini, H. (2019). Polemics on Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia between Rules and Practices. Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies. https://doi.org/10.14421/AJIS.2018.562.367-394

Wahyuni, S. (2017). Pelaksanaan Perkawinan Campur Beda Agama Antara Warga Melayu Malaysia dan Dayak Kalimantan di Daerah Perbatasan Sambas Kalimantan Barat. Ahwal. https://doi.org/10.14421/Ahwal.2016.09103

Wibawa, I. P. S. (2018). Hukum Tidak Tunggal: Pluralisme Hukum di Bali. https://doi.org/10.32795/DS.V1I18.101

Wijaya, F. D. (2025). Negotiating Religious Moderation and Legal Pluralism in Indonesia: A Socio-Anthropological Perspective. Kuriositas. https://doi.org/10.35905/kur.v18i1.12106

Yogi, M. K. (2023). Gender Matters. In The Routledge Handbook of Religion and Gender (p. ???). Routledge.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-21