Reformulation of the Principles of Balance and Business Continuity in Indonesian Bankruptcy Law: Legal Protection for Debtors Acting in Good Faith and the Application of the Ultimum Remedium Principle in Bankruptcy Petitions

Ria Permata Sukma

doi:10.31941/pj.v25i2.8263

Authors

Ria Permata Sukma Faculty of Law, Airlangga University, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31941/pj.v25i2.8263

Keywords:

Bankruptcy Law, Principle of Balance, Business Continuity, Insolvency Test, Ultimum Remedium.

Abstract

This research examines the weak implementation of the principle of balance and the principle of business continuity (going concern) under Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU). The ease and simplicity of the requirements for proving a bankruptcy petition (easy-entry) frequently create opportunities for abuse by creditors, thereby undermining the protection of debtors acting in good faith who are otherwise prospective but merely experiencing temporary liquidity difficulties. This research aims to analyze the weaknesses in the current legal framework governing bankruptcy and to formulate legal policy reforms that accommodate debtor protection in order to achieve commercial justice. This research employs normative legal research, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, particularly through an examination of Supreme Court Decision Number 1714K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022 as a landmark decision. The research demonstrates that the current bankruptcy system remains imbalanced because it is overly oriented toward the liquidation of assets without requiring a condition of actual insolvency. Therefore, an ideal reformulation of bankruptcy law should expressly integrate an insolvency test and position bankruptcy proceedings strictly as a last resort (ultimum remedium). Such reform is urgently needed to provide proportional opportunities for business rescue, thereby ensuring a balanced and equitable resolution of debts while strengthening legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Amrullah, M. (2020). Asas integritas dalam sistem hukum kepailitan sebagai sarana hukum menyelesaikan masalah utang piutang secara adil, cepat, terbuka dan efektif. Universitas Brawijaya.

Anisah, S. (2008). Perlindungan kepentingan kreditor dan debitor dalam hukum kepailitan di Indonesia. Total Media.

Aprita, S. (2019). Penerapan asas kelangsungan usaha menggunakan uji insolvensi: Upaya mewujudkan perlindungan hukum berbasis keadilan restrukturitatif bagi debitor pailit dalam penyelesaian sengketa kepailitan. Pustaka Abadi.

Campbell, E., Tooher, J., & Lee, P.-Y. (1996). Legal research: Materials and methods (4th ed.). LBC Information Services.

Central Jakarta District Court. (2022). Decision Number 23/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN Niaga Jkt Pusat.

Dirgantara, F., Putra, A. R., Darmawan, D., Khayru, R. K., & Wibowo, A. S. (2025). Peran hukum kepailitan dan penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang (PKPU) dalam penyelesaian sengketa utang piutang di Indonesia. Lex Stricta: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.46839/lexstricta.v4i1.1444

Fuady, M. (2014). Hukum pailit dalam teori dan praktik. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Gurning, S., Cumbhadrika, C., & Nugroho, M. A. (2026). Hukum kepailitan & penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang: Teori, praktik, dan perkembangan hukum di Indonesia. Penerbit KBM Indonesia.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia: Sebuah studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya, penanganannya oleh pengadilan dalam lingkungan peradilan umum dan pembentukan peradilan administrasi negara. Bina Ilmu.

Hartini, R. (2020). Hukum kepailitan. UMMPress.

Marzuki, P. M. (2017). Penelitian hukum (Edisi revisi, Cet. ke-13). Kencana.

Nugroho, S. A. (2018). Hukum kepailitan di Indonesia: Dalam teori dan praktik serta penerapan hukumnya. Kencana.

Prawirawinata, R. M. F. L. A. (2025). Kepailitan sebagai ultimum remedium penyelesaian utang piutang. Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia, 2(4), 91–104. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v2i4.1307

Republic of Indonesia. (2004). Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia of 2004 Number 131.

Shubhan, M. H. (2008). Hukum kepailitan: Prinsip, norma, dan praktik di peradilan. Kencana.

Sjahdeini, S. R. (2016). Sejarah, asas, dan teori hukum kepailitan: Memahami Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang. Kencana.

Sunarmi. (2017). Hukum kepailitan. Kencana.

Tolmie, F. (2013). Corporate and personal insolvency law. Routledge.

Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Supreme Court Decision Number 1714 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022.

Wibowo, A. (2025). Hukum kepailitan. Penerbit Yayasan Prima Agus Teknik.

Yordinand, Y., Purba, H., Sembiring, R., & Harianto, D. (2024). Asas kelangsungan usaha sebagai dasar penentuan kepailitan terhadap debitor solven (Studi kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1714 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022 juncto 23/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022/PN Niaga Jkt. Pusat). Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan, 5(7), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.3783/causa.v5i7.4376